IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSAWG] 🔔 WG Adoption Call for draft-pignataro-opsawg-oam-whaaat-question-mark-03

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Tue, 16 April 2024 13:20 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB6C8C14F5F4 for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 06:20:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.397
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.397 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NntHKc1C8VP9 for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 06:20:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2815FC14F5F9 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 06:20:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F61D3898B; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 09:20:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id f_H1T00pjJPc; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 09:20:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id C996138988; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 09:20:16 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1713273616; bh=X35uxh7PPjc0RR4SBB/VtNq+WRWyPlkGX3bs7Datxhc=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=ok74Gw99WT+a54LcTKSCCIchYCGueFx+eQgmaAh0oNliZ5rEv7DDCI+wsQwEW978M Y97W5PNsW2td2AIvtepQATvmDpBlCmVIWdTjwLdCbc9/zH9BqAjsxHUTh45gMP76T3 vpv98N/JjNUYiKxyfR1/f/C2Pw/4Tks6uE1LnttLaeggta9AgdZlVd0EuvWDTnXA8j cofwclFyNhqVX6Vm2uZy2s4N/t6oMo9IYpKDj2BLbsM4qlZJWXGYmijUql+0GYsoQ4 Gq8d91JXLBkWtV1dEweTQnsWTH3sgTSnS2oJ2EQzO78qdRLg9dfvxeZ87+Rj3vnumx nizXBpizBI2rw==
Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id C50C67E; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 09:20:16 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com, OPSAWG <opsawg@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <DU2PR02MB1016068EEC9873F57A88091C588082@DU2PR02MB10160.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CA+RyBmUSa00f9U2iHecBMPLGqoLpGidPytEpzxCAn6vuMhL+TA@mail.gmail.com> <FC433E30-B4BD-47A2-BDBA-E966869B5208@gmail.com> <CA+RyBmVauWq_budXs=ojDHC5YFw2GA-g5ns9hKUHRQZZ=Q9Dyw@mail.gmail.com> <DU2PR02MB1016068EEC9873F57A88091C588082@DU2PR02MB10160.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.8+dev; GNU Emacs 28.2
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 09:20:16 -0400
Message-ID: <18315.1713273616@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/M-SJPFO9TUQVP1gspQTFc7OVTtA>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] 🔔 WG Adoption Call for draft-pignataro-opsawg-oam-whaaat-question-mark-03
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 13:20:28 -0000

mohamed.boucadair@orange.com wrote:
    > For example, Michael indicated that he wished he had a better name for
    > "Virtual In-Band OAM" (I still don’t digest what does that mean
    > actually). I also indicated that I wished I had terms for the following
    > when I edited RFC 9451:

The fact that you don't know what it means from the term means that we got
something wrong in the name in my opinion :-)

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email