Re: [OPSAWG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7666 (7258)

Chris Smiley <csmiley@amsl.com> Thu, 01 December 2022 21:46 UTC

Return-Path: <csmiley@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAFA3C14CE4A for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Dec 2022 13:46:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ye1RFH5mYHDG for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Dec 2022 13:46:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from c8a.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12719C14F748 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Dec 2022 13:46:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB5754243E42; Thu, 1 Dec 2022 13:46:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uo9AiibdtoDM; Thu, 1 Dec 2022 13:46:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.14] (cpe-76-95-228-63.socal.res.rr.com [76.95.228.63]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A6BF24243EC3; Thu, 1 Dec 2022 13:46:22 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: Chris Smiley <csmiley@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20221201022613.3DF431C75937@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2022 13:46:21 -0800
Cc: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F91422F8-95E5-46FA-A06B-7591269C26FD@amsl.com>
References: <20221201022613.3DF431C75937@rfcpa.amsl.com>
To: panda@hongo.wide.ad.jp, mrm@vmware.com, j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de, keiichi@iijlab.net, tina.tsou.zouting@huawei.com, opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/ABAhmncTAG40CU7Ch6qJsVxjGo4>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7666 (7258)
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2022 21:46:26 -0000

Greetings,

FYI - this report has been deleted as junk.

Thank you.

RFC Editor/cs

> On Nov 30, 2022, at 6:26 PM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7666,
> "Management Information Base for Virtual Machines Controlled by a Hypervisor".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7258
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Dana Renee Hopkins <unpproductions@gmail.com>
> 
> Section: 3233702267
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> Search RFCs
> number, title, keyword, or author surname
> Advanced Search
> RFC Editor
> RFC Errata
> RFC 7666, "Management Information Base for Virtual Machines Controlled by a Hypervisor", October 2015
> Source of RFC: opsawg (ops)
> Found 1 record.
> 
> Errata ID: 4710
> Status: Verified
> Type: Editorial
> Publication Format(s) : TEXT
> Reported By: jean-marie Kubek
> Date Reported: 2016-06-15
> Verifier Name: Benoit Claise
> Date Verified: 2016-06-17
> Section 6.2 IANA MIB says:
> 
> IANAStorageMediaType ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
>       STATUS       current
>       DESCRIPTION
>               "The media type of a storage device:
> 
>               unknown(1)     The media type is unknown, e.g., because
>                              the implementation failed to obtain the
>                              media type from the hypervisor.
> 
>               other(2)       The media type is other than those
>                              defined in this conversion.
> It should say:
> 
> IANAStorageMediaType ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
>       STATUS       current
>       DESCRIPTION
>               "The media type of a storage device:
> 
>                 other(1)       The media type is other than those
>                                defined in this conversion.
> 
>                 unknown(2)     The media type is unknown, e.g., because
>                                the implementation failed to obtain the
>                                media type from the hypervisor.
> 
> Notes:
> 
> Inversion of other and unknown integer values in the description of the IANAStorageMediaType TEXTUAL-CONVENTION.
> 
> FIrst referenced at IANA RT as [IANA #913286] Incoherency in IANA-STORAGE-MEDIA-TYPE-MIB
> 
> Search for errata for other RFCs.
> 
> Report New Errata
> 
> 
> 
> IAB • IANA • IETF • IRTF • ISE • ISOC • IETF Trust
> Reports • Privacy Statement • Site Map • Contact Us
> 
> 
> Document Retrieval
> Errata
> Frequently Asked Questions
> Future Format FAQ
> History
> About Us
> Other Information
> Publication Process
> Publication Queue
> Style Guide
> Advanced Search
> number, title, keyword, or author surname
> 
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> Enclosure
> 
> Notes
> -----
> It's not the right document
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC7666 (draft-ietf-opsawg-vmm-mib-04)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Management Information Base for Virtual Machines Controlled by a Hypervisor
> Publication Date    : October 2015
> Author(s)           : H. Asai, M. MacFaden, J. Schoenwaelder, K. Shima, T. Tsou
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Operations and Management Area Working Group
> Area                : Operations and Management
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>