[OPSAWG] Martin Duke's Discuss on draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm-11: (with DISCUSS)

[Martin Duke via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm-11: Discuss

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCUSS:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

(7.6.3) Is there a reason the TCP-AO model in this draft is different from the
one in draft-ietf-idr-bgp-model-11? That draft is using a model developed in
the TCPM WG (draft-ietf-tcpm-yang-tcp) specifically for that purpose.

If there is no compelling requirement for something different, or the TCPM
modelling work can be stretched to cover this use case as well, it would be far
better than rolling a totally separate TCP YANG model here.