Re: [OPSAWG] Martin Duke's Discuss on draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm-11: (with DISCUSS)

mohamed.boucadair@orange.com Mon, 27 September 2021 09:22 UTC

Return-Path: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F1903A0BB0; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 02:22:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=orange.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xzI3U0Ah9MGa; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 02:22:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.orange.com (relais-inet.orange.com [80.12.70.36]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 776CF3A0BA6; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 02:22:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from opfednr00.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.64]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by opfednr22.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTPS id 4HHxxB3X6tzyvl; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 11:22:22 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=orange.com; s=ORANGE001; t=1632734542; bh=Y/DxfVVcxu6qimJuhAfC0WetRSnVV8dl/Qg/OhfAS14=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=T4MSjF7rT2v99fmZmWSx1RWeWJhLeoIIxDH09aApkQKJ69YMhLCXVa/37AlDSpcjW 6ne3ClXeuqy83ezeE3wFevQpd2cWhsrBjexDPN03OK/KPzWtb3n1BVX0doJvEs/dKS rIKd7EAc1PRGSIiUGHLOZd4mBAnLXOzpDWSui0Fe4ADZnfPjFAldI8oIrhP8R4kuEp W6EVK7Kb35cRZ8G4p4VpTpmtUXTpH+zwk++3LMLR1Tu071BC+LlDkOYyh8vkthTyCN kC5G85Km4dDXLWrF3oTSHh/ZbFym8hnMkq3h543lLyROVNpIUU8ufzKy3uPFAVLO8F A9JU56jahhMEw==
Received: from Exchangemail-eme6.itn.ftgroup (unknown [xx.xx.13.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by opfednr00.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTPS id 4HHxxB2j4xzDq7y; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 11:22:22 +0200 (CEST)
From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
To: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
CC: "draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm@ietf.org>, "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>, "opsawg-chairs@ietf.org" <opsawg-chairs@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Martin Duke's Discuss on draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm-11: (with DISCUSS)
Thread-Index: AQHXrX+GJ2n8uyxqK0WEDOPL4Bd2lauseO4QgAst2ZA=
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 09:22:21 +0000
Message-ID: <30569_1632734542_61518D4E_30569_493_1_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93303540C7B2@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <163207412100.20947.6667133067858998761@ietfa.amsl.com> <14634_1632121378_61483222_14634_428_9_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B9330354083E9@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
In-Reply-To: <14634_1632121378_61483222_14634_428_9_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B9330354083E9@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.114.13.247]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/gb8hVPdgnhpjgDH6xzMTH9kBCZs>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Martin Duke's Discuss on draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm-11: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 09:22:30 -0000

Hi Martin ,

The proposed changes to echo the clarification provided below and the discussion with Michael (thanks) are now implemented in a new revision:

URL:            https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm-12.txt 
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm/ 
Htmlized:       https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm 
Diff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm-12

Please me know if you still have any comment. Thank you. 

Cheers,
Med

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de
> mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
> Envoyé : lundi 20 septembre 2021 09:03
> À : Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>; The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
> Cc : draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm@ietf.org; opsawg@ietf.org; opsawg-
> chairs@ietf.org
> Objet : Re: [OPSAWG] Martin Duke's Discuss on draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-
> l3nm-11: (with DISCUSS)
> 
> Hi Martin,
> 
> Thank you for the review.
> 
> I'm very familiar with draft-ietf-tcpm-yang-tcp (as you can see in the
> ACK section of that document).
> 
> The structure in draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm follows the one in draft-
> ietf-idr-bgp-model:
> 
> draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm
> 
>   |     |  |     +--rw (option)?
>   |     |  |        +--:(tcp-ao)
>   |     |  |        |  +--rw enable-tcp-ao?      boolean
>   |     |  |        |  +--rw ao-keychain?        key-chain:key-chain-ref
> 
> 
> draft-ietf-idr-bgp-model
> 
>          |  |  |  +--rw (option)?
>          |  |  |     +--:(ao)
>          |  |  |     |  +--rw enable-ao?             boolean
>          |  |  |     |  +--rw send-id?               uint8
>          |  |  |     |  +--rw recv-id?               uint8
>          |  |  |     |  +--rw include-tcp-options?   boolean
>          |  |  |     |  +--rw accept-ao-mismatch?    boolean
>          |  |  |     |  +--rw ao-keychain?
>          |  |  |     |          key-chain:key-chain-ref
> 
> We are not echoing the full structure because the L3NM is a network
> model, not a device model. A network model does not aim to control every
> parameter that can be manipulated at the device level. Other than
> enabling/disabling TCP-AP and providing the ao-keychain, we didn't
> identify a need to control and customize at the network service level
> the data nodes in draft-ietf-tcpm-yang-tcp:
> 
>          |  |  |     |  +--rw send-id?               uint8
>          |  |  |     |  +--rw recv-id?               uint8
>          |  |  |     |  +--rw include-tcp-options?   boolean
>          |  |  |     |  +--rw accept-ao-mismatch?    boolean
> 
> These optional nodes can be part of a local profile that can be directly
> manipulated at the device module (draft-ietf-idr-bgp-model).
> 
> We can make these changes, though:
> 
> s/tcp-ao/ao
> s/enable-tcp-ao/enable-ao
> 
> Cheers,
> Med
> 
> > -----Message d'origine-----
> > De : Martin Duke via Datatracker [mailto:noreply@ietf.org] Envoyé :
> > dimanche 19 septembre 2021 19:55 À : The IESG <iesg@ietf.org> Cc :
> > draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm@ietf.org; opsawg-chairs@ietf.org;
> > opsawg@ietf.org; adrian@olddog.co.uk; adrian@olddog.co.uk Objet :
> > Martin Duke's Discuss on draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm-11: (with
> > DISCUSS)
> >
> > Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for
> > draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm-11: Discuss
> >
> > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut
> > this introductory paragraph, however.)
> >
> >
> > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-
> > criteria.html
> > for more information about DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> >
> >
> > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm/
> >
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > DISCUSS:
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > (7.6.3) Is there a reason the TCP-AO model in this draft is different
> > from the one in draft-ietf-idr-bgp-model-11? That draft is using a
> > model developed in the TCPM WG (draft-ietf-tcpm-yang-tcp) specifically
> > for that purpose.
> >
> > If there is no compelling requirement for something different, or the
> > TCPM modelling work can be stretched to cover this use case as well,
> > it would be far better than rolling a totally separate TCP YANG model
> here.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> ________________________________________________________________________
> _________________________________________________
> 
> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations
> confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses,
> exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par
> erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les
> pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles
> d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete
> altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
> 
> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged
> information that may be protected by law; they should not be
> distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and
> delete this message and its attachments.
> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have
> been modified, changed or falsified.
> Thank you.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OPSAWG mailing list
> OPSAWG@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.