IETF Logo Mail Archive

[OPSEC] draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv4-nets

"Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve)" <gvandeve@cisco.com> Fri, 17 August 2012 08:10 UTC

Return-Path: <gvandeve@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67B5E21F853E for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 01:10:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.414
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.414 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.184, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id On8Ddqp5UdYa for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 01:10:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49DDE21F853A for <opsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 01:10:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=gvandeve@cisco.com; l=2990; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1345191002; x=1346400602; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=tSUL6MuVv1dkbZo0EXq32UmlnNtNdrFPzHdskF16d28=; b=lVLLy9A8Q4BzcvzKT6YGAxZKGvsns1GMA2ukglRmDIAQJHbJrstjnsLz 9QcHfthGDFEmFAS/w43eqqSD05+FpJNWwkHxRVeIBvkhz8vmPvLE06QrI 5fTwaV2CUeQvYU37Uyw6ghTnCTT60LgsaWp4yDz9ej73O2QZ1rcMSDL6i U=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EAA/8LVCtJXG9/2dsb2JhbABFgkq3aoEHgiIBBBIBChBMEgEMHlYmAQQODRqHa5oFoD2RJWADo3uBZoJfgV8
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.77,783,1336348800"; d="scan'208,217"; a="112581566"
Received: from rcdn-core2-2.cisco.com ([173.37.113.189]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 17 Aug 2012 08:10:01 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x12.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x12.cisco.com [173.36.12.86]) by rcdn-core2-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7H8A1cC031662 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 17 Aug 2012 08:10:01 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x12.cisco.com ([169.254.7.122]) by xhc-aln-x12.cisco.com ([173.36.12.86]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.004; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 03:10:01 -0500
From: "Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve)" <gvandeve@cisco.com>
To: "Fernando Gont (fgont@si6networks.com)" <fgont@si6networks.com>
Thread-Topic: draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv4-nets
Thread-Index: Ac18T01ACwflm2isSWu2MfBRi7t6fA==
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 08:10:00 +0000
Message-ID: <67832B1175062E48926BF3CB27C49B240761BE@xmb-aln-x12.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.61.94.161]
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.2.0.1135-7.000.1014-19120.004
x-tm-as-result: No--35.412000-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_67832B1175062E48926BF3CB27C49B240761BExmbalnx12ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "opsec@ietf.org" <opsec@ietf.org>
Subject: [OPSEC] draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv4-nets
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsec>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 08:10:03 -0000

Hi Fernando,

I have seen more supportive messages as un-supportive messages on this draft.
Once you have updated the draft, we will do a 2 week call for WG adoption on the email list.

If then there is no objection we will ask you to resubmit as WG document.

Kind Regards,
G/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email