Re: [OPSEC] draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv4-nets
Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> Sat, 18 August 2012 09:01 UTC
Return-Path: <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00FDE21F855E for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 02:01:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PEIvd7N-7A1z for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 02:01:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from web01.jbserver.net (web01.jbserver.net [IPv6:2a00:d10:2000:e::3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E64121F8555 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 02:01:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [186.134.30.116] (helo=[192.168.123.104]) by web01.jbserver.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from <fgont@si6networks.com>) id 1T2eul-0002xl-GO; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 11:01:51 +0200
Message-ID: <502F59CF.5000801@si6networks.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 06:01:03 -0300
From: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Organization: SI6 Networks
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120714 Thunderbird/14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve)" <gvandeve@cisco.com>
References: <67832B1175062E48926BF3CB27C49B240761BE@xmb-aln-x12.cisco.com> <502E0D7C.3080504@si6networks.com> <67832B1175062E48926BF3CB27C49B24076A9B@xmb-aln-x12.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <67832B1175062E48926BF3CB27C49B24076A9B@xmb-aln-x12.cisco.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5a1pre
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "opsec@ietf.org" <opsec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OPSEC] draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv4-nets
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsec>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 09:01:57 -0000
Hi, Gunter, On 08/18/2012 04:52 AM, Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve) wrote: > I would be inclined to go for your option #2 and see if there is > rough consensus on the point of track. Just double-checking: Since the track is going to be part of the poll, I may live the track "as is" (bcp), right? -- Thus, based on the outcome of the poll, I could change the track if necessary. P.S.: Other than this, I have the next rev ready.. Thanks! Best regards, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492
- [OPSEC] draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv… Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve)
- Re: [OPSEC] draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-implications-on… Fernando Gont
- Re: [OPSEC] draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-implications-on… Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve)
- Re: [OPSEC] draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-implications-on… Fernando Gont
- Re: [OPSEC] draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-implications-on… Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve)
- Re: [OPSEC] draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-implications-on… Fernando Gont
- Re: [OPSEC] draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-implications-on… Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve)