Re: [OPSEC] draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv4-nets
Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> Fri, 17 August 2012 09:24 UTC
Return-Path: <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80AD121F855E for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 02:24:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ezuKwwJCJIOb for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 02:24:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from web01.jbserver.net (web01.jbserver.net [IPv6:2a00:d10:2000:e::3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3F4721F852C for <opsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 02:24:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [2001:5c0:1400:a::1edd] by web01.jbserver.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from <fgont@si6networks.com>) id 1T2Iml-0004T4-IP; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 11:24:12 +0200
Message-ID: <502E0D7C.3080504@si6networks.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 06:23:08 -0300
From: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Organization: SI6 Networks
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120714 Thunderbird/14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve)" <gvandeve@cisco.com>
References: <67832B1175062E48926BF3CB27C49B240761BE@xmb-aln-x12.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <67832B1175062E48926BF3CB27C49B240761BE@xmb-aln-x12.cisco.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5a1pre
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "opsec@ietf.org" <opsec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OPSEC] draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv4-nets
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsec>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 09:24:18 -0000
Hi, Gunter, On 08/17/2012 05:10 AM, Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve) wrote: > I have seen more supportive messages as un-supportive messages on this > draft. > > Once you have updated the draft, we will do a 2 week call for WG > adoption on the email list. The only remaining bit to act/decide upon is the track. I've seen mixed opinions on the subject. Should the wg be polled about adoption on the document, and then decide on the track? Should the poll be about adopting the document *and* about the desired track? Thanks! Best regards, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492
- [OPSEC] draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv… Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve)
- Re: [OPSEC] draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-implications-on… Fernando Gont
- Re: [OPSEC] draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-implications-on… Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve)
- Re: [OPSEC] draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-implications-on… Fernando Gont
- Re: [OPSEC] draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-implications-on… Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve)
- Re: [OPSEC] draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-implications-on… Fernando Gont
- Re: [OPSEC] draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-implications-on… Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve)