IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSEC] draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv4-nets

"Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve)" <gvandeve@cisco.com> Sun, 19 August 2012 20:04 UTC

Return-Path: <gvandeve@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 629F321F85A8 for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Aug 2012 13:04:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.459
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.459 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.140, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8q12LbH6xB6N for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Aug 2012 13:04:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B96F521F85A0 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Aug 2012 13:04:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=gvandeve@cisco.com; l=947; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1345406685; x=1346616285; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=ibwK7Gzpa5GwOIjK1h8G10Bm/Y5jg3xnSH3iKLtk6Yw=; b=Prh910RZ26n6ZYdFX/hitZ0oM995d3kfGmdYq0GD9/SULDRxJSgKyeaT 3nUH/jJv8Dd8phkv/gnidQhWd6+Z+TrjMuNbMT+kSfptaF/VIkI69vo8M W2vdiBcuhxBCWk1CtAGsIXYLBN4mz9Q4OGOMKpWLqyYeUyuSPH4DMvgw3 w=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AggFAJdGMVCtJXG9/2dsb2JhbABFhTq1BYEHgiABAQEEEgEnPwwEAgEIDgMEAQEBChQJBzIUCQgBAQQOBQgah2uYPZ8miwsahhhgA6N8gWaCYYFh
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.77,794,1336348800"; d="scan'208";a="112929960"
Received: from rcdn-core2-2.cisco.com ([173.37.113.189]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 19 Aug 2012 20:04:31 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x09.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x09.cisco.com [173.37.183.83]) by rcdn-core2-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7JK4Vof007959 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Sun, 19 Aug 2012 20:04:31 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x12.cisco.com ([169.254.7.122]) by xhc-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([173.37.183.83]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.004; Sun, 19 Aug 2012 15:04:30 -0500
From: "Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve)" <gvandeve@cisco.com>
To: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Thread-Topic: draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv4-nets
Thread-Index: Ac18T01ACwflm2isSWu2MfBRi7t6fAANIVgAACShttAADON0gAA+9s0A
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 20:04:29 +0000
Message-ID: <67832B1175062E48926BF3CB27C49B24076BE6@xmb-aln-x12.cisco.com>
References: <67832B1175062E48926BF3CB27C49B240761BE@xmb-aln-x12.cisco.com> <502E0D7C.3080504@si6networks.com> <67832B1175062E48926BF3CB27C49B24076A9B@xmb-aln-x12.cisco.com> <502F59CF.5000801@si6networks.com>
In-Reply-To: <502F59CF.5000801@si6networks.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.61.81.14]
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.2.0.1135-7.000.1014-19126.001
x-tm-as-result: No--34.801400-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "opsec@ietf.org" <opsec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OPSEC] draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv4-nets
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsec>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 20:04:46 -0000

Sounds reasonable if that is what you understood from current discussions in the list.

Ciao,
G/

-----Original Message-----
From: Fernando Gont [mailto:fgont@si6networks.com] 
Sent: 18 August 2012 11:01
To: Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve)
Cc: opsec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv4-nets

Hi, Gunter,

On 08/18/2012 04:52 AM, Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve) wrote:
> I would be inclined to go for your option #2 and see if there is rough 
> consensus on the point of track.

Just double-checking: Since the track is going to be part of the poll, I may live the track "as is" (bcp), right? -- Thus, based on the outcome of the poll, I could change the track if necessary.

P.S.: Other than this, I have the next rev ready..

Thanks!

Best regards,
--
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email