Re: [OPSEC] draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv4-nets

[Fernando Gont <[e-mail]>]

Hi, Gunter,

Regarding the track, there has been mixed opinions on what would be the
appropriate track. However, my feeling is that this is to some extent a
secondary issue (after all, the track can always be changed at a later
time).

That said, the wg can be polled about the proper track during the call
for adoption, and, if there's consensus on adoption of the document, but
lack of consensus on a proper track, we can fall back to
"Informational", and that's it. (i.e., the track is not "cast in stone").

P.S.: I will resubmit the I-D such that you can perform the call for
adoption.

Thanks!

Best regards,
Fernando




On 08/19/2012 05:04 PM, Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve) wrote:
> Sounds reasonable if that is what you understood from current discussions in the list.
> 
> Ciao,
> G/
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fernando Gont [mailto:[e-mail]] 
> Sent: 18 August 2012 11:01
> To: Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve)
> Cc: [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv4-nets
> 
> Hi, Gunter,
> 
> On 08/18/2012 04:52 AM, Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve) wrote:
>> I would be inclined to go for your option #2 and see if there is rough 
>> consensus on the point of track.
> 
> Just double-checking: Since the track is going to be part of the poll, I may live the track "as is" (bcp), right? -- Thus, based on the outcome of the poll, I could change the track if necessary.
> 
> P.S.: Other than this, I have the next rev ready..
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Best regards,
> --
> Fernando Gont
> SI6 Networks
> e-mail: [e-mail]
> PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492
> 
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: [e-mail]
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492