IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Comments on draft-katz-yeung-traffic-08.txt

Don Goodspeed <dgoodspe@EXCITE.COM> Fri, 18 October 2002 18:33 UTC

Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com (cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA06301 for <ospf-archive@LISTS.IETF.ORG>; Fri, 18 Oct 2002 14:33:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from walnut (209.119.0.61) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <9.0077F052@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Fri, 18 Oct 2002 14:35:20 -0400
Received: from DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM by DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8e) with spool id 313606 for OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM; Fri, 18 Oct 2002 14:35:20 -0400
Received: from 207.159.120.60 by WALNUT.EASE.LSOFT.COM (SMTPL release 1.0f) with TCP; Fri, 18 Oct 2002 14:35:20 -0400
Received: by xmxpita.excite.com (Postfix, from userid 110) id 64146B6DF; Fri, 18 Oct 2002 14:35:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [63.104.212.252] by xprdmailfe17.nwk.excite.com via HTTP; Fri, 18 Oct 2002 14:35:15 EST
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: ID = b4f718530cf8af0dd8df25e0425ffee0
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Sender: dgoodspe@excite.com
X-Mailer: PHP
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <20021018183515.64146B6DF@xmxpita.excite.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 14:35:15 -0400
Reply-To: Mailing List <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>
Sender: Mailing List <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>
From: Don Goodspeed <dgoodspe@EXCITE.COM>
Subject: Re: Comments on draft-katz-yeung-traffic-08.txt
To: OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
Precedence: list
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

All,

What would be the implications of stating that all non-DR routers
on a multi-access network list the DR, and the DR should list the
BDR.  Of course, what happens when only one router is DR-eligible?

If we went with the scheme below, I assume we would then re-adver-
tise the TE LSA when the # of other routers reaches 1 or 0?

-don

 --- On Fri 10/18, Rohit Dube  wrote:
From: Rohit Dube [mailto: rohit@XEBEO.COM]
To: OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 10:04:42 -0400
Subject: Re: Comments on draft-katz-yeung-traffic-08.txt

> Acee,
>
> On Fri, 18 Oct 2002 00:12:09 -0400 Acee Lindem writes:
> =>> While this document doesn't work ideally for multipoint links
> with
> =>> more that 2 devices, it is used.
> =>
> =>
> =>Should a router withdraw it's TE LSA for the link if it
> =>detects > 2 routers on a multi-access network?
>
> I think this is a good idea as this will prevent non-adjacent nodes from
> (potentially) getting confused.
>
> Best,
> --rohit.
>

_______________________________________________
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email