IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OSPF] Poll for WG adoption of draft-xu-ospf-routable-ip-address

Xuxiaohu <xuxiaohu@huawei.com> Wed, 27 August 2014 02:10 UTC

Return-Path: <xuxiaohu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47E471A035D for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 19:10:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.868
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.868 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SpW2DFyEniZS for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 19:10:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B2E01A0357 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 19:10:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BLU74411; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 02:10:38 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from nkgeml405-hub.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.36) by lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 03:10:38 +0100
Received: from NKGEML512-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.8.204]) by nkgeml405-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.36]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 10:10:31 +0800
From: Xuxiaohu <xuxiaohu@huawei.com>
To: Abhay Roy <akr@cisco.com>, "ospf@ietf.org" <ospf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [OSPF] Poll for WG adoption of draft-xu-ospf-routable-ip-address
Thread-Index: AQHPwJgKaTjZxA11b0yaz1/fkHwifJvjtuMg
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 02:10:31 +0000
Message-ID: <1FEE3F8F5CCDE64C9A8E8F4AD27C19EE082AB2DA@NKGEML512-MBS.china.huawei.com>
References: <53FB8718.1090003@cisco.com> <53FB89B0.2040407@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <53FB89B0.2040407@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.111.98.134]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_1FEE3F8F5CCDE64C9A8E8F4AD27C19EE082AB2DANKGEML512MBSchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/kA5zZN6oc4eqdNkjB-cPaLAeJuQ
Subject: Re: [OSPF] Poll for WG adoption of draft-xu-ospf-routable-ip-address
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 02:10:43 -0000

Support as a co-author.

Xiaohu

From: OSPF [mailto:ospf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Abhay Roy
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2014 3:09 AM
To: ospf@ietf.org
Subject: [OSPF] Poll for WG adoption of draft-xu-ospf-routable-ip-address

This is a simple document with a few strong drivers (ELC and S-BFD) requiring it..

Please share your support or objections in making it a WG document.

Regards,
-Abhay
On 8/25/14, 11:57 AM, Abhay Roy wrote:
[speaking as WG member]

Two comments..

1. Section 3 has this text - "This TLV is only applicable to OSPFv2.".
    I believe, this should also be applicable to RFC5838, i.e. for IPv4 AF's

2. Section 3 and 4 describes the scope as SHOULD be domain-wide. I personally don't see any real use cause of any lessor scope (Area or Link) since we have mechanisms to generate routable IP address for those scopes already. So I would suggest we limit the scope of this document to be "MUST be domain-wide". Any concerns with that?

Regards,
-Abhay




_______________________________________________

OSPF mailing list

OSPF@ietf.org<mailto:OSPF@ietf.org>

https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email