IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-li-pce-pcep-srv6-yang-07

Chengli <c.l@huawei.com> Tue, 06 September 2022 01:50 UTC

Return-Path: <c.l@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CC16C14F748; Mon, 5 Sep 2022 18:50:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2yBGNH-Of1wa; Mon, 5 Sep 2022 18:49:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16345C14F746; Mon, 5 Sep 2022 18:49:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fraeml740-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.206]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4MM7bH1tN3z688jJ; Tue, 6 Sep 2022 09:48:59 +0800 (CST)
Received: from dggpemm100002.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.179) by fraeml740-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.221) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.31; Tue, 6 Sep 2022 03:49:54 +0200
Received: from dggpemm500003.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.56) by dggpemm100002.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.179) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Tue, 6 Sep 2022 09:49:52 +0800
Received: from dggpemm500003.china.huawei.com ([7.185.36.56]) by dggpemm500003.china.huawei.com ([7.185.36.56]) with mapi id 15.01.2375.024; Tue, 6 Sep 2022 09:49:52 +0800
From: Chengli <c.l@huawei.com>
To: Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com>, "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-li-pce-pcep-srv6-yang@ietf.org" <draft-li-pce-pcep-srv6-yang@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: WG Adoption of draft-li-pce-pcep-srv6-yang-07
Thread-Index: AQHYvqvVfYEYgd8nE02p/bddrNJ4nq3RqDng
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2022 01:49:52 +0000
Message-ID: <39b3dce0e79d468e9a2433c053c53120@huawei.com>
References: <CAP7zK5Z3oK6rzuh1nmhrDZkovbQG2r1MkO4DhgaP2MSdYN09eQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAP7zK5Z3oK6rzuh1nmhrDZkovbQG2r1MkO4DhgaP2MSdYN09eQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.112.40.81]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_39b3dce0e79d468e9a2433c053c53120huaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/2A2Eq-fcWq7-bCKIZgeghCzwv5Q>
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-li-pce-pcep-srv6-yang-07
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2022 01:50:02 -0000

HI WG,

I support the adoption as an author.

This should be adopted by the PCE WG because this is a PCEP related extension draft.

Thanks,
Cheng


From: Dhruv Dhody [mailto:dd@dhruvdhody.com]
Sent: Friday, September 2, 2022 5:09 PM
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: draft-li-pce-pcep-srv6-yang@ietf.org
Subject: WG Adoption of draft-li-pce-pcep-srv6-yang-07

Hi WG,

This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-li-pce-pcep-srv6-yang-07.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-pce-pcep-srv6-yang/

Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the list.

Please respond by Monday 19th Sept 2022.

Please be more vocal during WG polls!

Thanks!
Dhruv & Julien

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email