Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-li-pce-pcep-srv6-yang-07

Zhuangshunwan <zhuangshunwan@huawei.com> Mon, 05 September 2022 07:18 UTC

Return-Path: <zhuangshunwan@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F04A6C15256B; Mon, 5 Sep 2022 00:18:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.207
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.207 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zmpHkWu9-qAx; Mon, 5 Sep 2022 00:18:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA7A2C1522DD; Mon, 5 Sep 2022 00:18:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fraeml744-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.201]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4MLfwb3M3Mz686Vq; Mon, 5 Sep 2022 15:17:19 +0800 (CST)
Received: from kwepemi100001.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.215) by fraeml744-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.225) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.31; Mon, 5 Sep 2022 09:17:59 +0200
Received: from kwepemi500002.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.171) by kwepemi100001.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.215) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Mon, 5 Sep 2022 15:17:58 +0800
Received: from kwepemi500002.china.huawei.com ([7.221.188.171]) by kwepemi500002.china.huawei.com ([7.221.188.171]) with mapi id 15.01.2375.024; Mon, 5 Sep 2022 15:17:58 +0800
From: Zhuangshunwan <zhuangshunwan@huawei.com>
To: Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com>, "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-li-pce-pcep-srv6-yang@ietf.org" <draft-li-pce-pcep-srv6-yang@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: WG Adoption of draft-li-pce-pcep-srv6-yang-07
Thread-Index: AQHYvqvVfYEYgd8nE02p/bddrNJ4nq3QcNYg
Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2022 07:17:58 +0000
Message-ID: <3215d0d11ab24723b46c099020fc12e1@huawei.com>
References: <CAP7zK5Z3oK6rzuh1nmhrDZkovbQG2r1MkO4DhgaP2MSdYN09eQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAP7zK5Z3oK6rzuh1nmhrDZkovbQG2r1MkO4DhgaP2MSdYN09eQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.108.202.95]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_3215d0d11ab24723b46c099020fc12e1huaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/n2IzkOLBX5FxCr9JLMhAAPBHBuE>
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-li-pce-pcep-srv6-yang-07
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2022 07:18:04 -0000

Hi Dhruv & Julien & WG,

I've read this draft. This is a very useful document, and I support the WG's adoption of it.

Best Regards,
Shunwan


From: Dhruv Dhody [mailto:dd@dhruvdhody.com]
Sent: Friday, September 2, 2022 5:09 PM
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: draft-li-pce-pcep-srv6-yang@ietf.org
Subject: WG Adoption of draft-li-pce-pcep-srv6-yang-07

Hi WG,

This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-li-pce-pcep-srv6-yang-07.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-pce-pcep-srv6-yang/

Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the list.

Please respond by Monday 19th Sept 2022.

Please be more vocal during WG polls!

Thanks!
Dhruv & Julien