Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-li-pce-pcep-srv6-yang-07

Li Cong <licong@chinatelecom.cn> Wed, 14 September 2022 15:56 UTC

Return-Path: <licong@chinatelecom.cn>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03524C14CF0C for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 08:56:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.904
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.904 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kfdwuRz51737 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 08:56:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from chinatelecom.cn (prt-mail.chinatelecom.cn [42.123.76.220]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6903DC14E514 for <pce@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 08:56:30 -0700 (PDT)
HMM_SOURCE_IP: 172.18.0.218:47758.285690631
HMM_ATTACHE_NUM: 0000
HMM_SOURCE_TYPE: SMTP
Received: from clientip-120.244.160.67 (unknown [172.18.0.218]) by chinatelecom.cn (HERMES) with SMTP id 8762D280090; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 23:56:20 +0800 (CST)
X-189-SAVE-TO-SEND: 71080549@chinatelecom.cn
Received: from ([172.18.0.218]) by app0025 with ESMTP id a8aa483bf515414bbe5d14fb9e86d21c for pce@ietf.org; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 23:56:25 CST
X-Transaction-ID: a8aa483bf515414bbe5d14fb9e86d21c
X-Real-From: licong@chinatelecom.cn
X-Receive-IP: 172.18.0.218
X-MEDUSA-Status: 0
Sender: licong@chinatelecom.cn
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.64.22081401
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 23:56:17 +0800
From: Li Cong <licong@chinatelecom.cn>
To: "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <68A2B7AD-85E3-40D8-932D-ACA925B5E03D@chinatelecom.cn>
Thread-Topic: WG Adoption of draft-li-pce-pcep-srv6-yang-07
References: <CAP7zK5Z3oK6rzuh1nmhrDZkovbQG2r1MkO4DhgaP2MSdYN09eQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAP7zK5Z3oK6rzuh1nmhrDZkovbQG2r1MkO4DhgaP2MSdYN09eQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3746044579_1644282782"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/dYzp0MqAs3oizuZBYkK2wCJjrBQ>
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-li-pce-pcep-srv6-yang-07
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 15:56:33 -0000

Hi WG,

 

This draft provides a PCEP-SRv6 YANG module,  which is very useful for the SRv6 deployment.

 

I support the adoption of this draft.

 

Best regards,

Cong Li

 

发件人: Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com>
日期: 2022年9月2日 星期五 下午5:09
收件人: "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
抄送: "draft-li-pce-pcep-srv6-yang@ietf.org" <draft-li-pce-pcep-srv6-yang@ietf.org>
主题: WG Adoption of draft-li-pce-pcep-srv6-yang-07
重发发件人: <alias-bounces@ietf.org>

 

Hi WG,

This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-li-pce-pcep-srv6-yang-07.

 

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-pce-pcep-srv6-yang/

 

Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the list.

Please respond by Monday 19th Sept 2022.

 

Please be more vocal during WG polls! 

Thanks!
Dhruv & Julien