Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-li-pce-pcep-srv6-yang-07

Boris Khasanov <bhassanov@yandex-team.ru> Wed, 14 September 2022 09:27 UTC

Return-Path: <bhassanov@yandex-team.ru>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D1D4C14CE42; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 02:27:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.332
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.332 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG=0.377, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=yandex-team.ru
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3R_XBMtALZpY; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 02:27:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from forwardcorp1o.mail.yandex.net (forwardcorp1o.mail.yandex.net [95.108.205.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C950C1522AF; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 02:27:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sas2-6a1db1376cb6.qloud-c.yandex.net (sas2-6a1db1376cb6.qloud-c.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:c08:bb0f:0:640:6a1d:b137]) by forwardcorp1o.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 5DF652E1250; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 12:27:27 +0300 (MSK)
Received: from 2a02:6b8:c14:2791:0:640:4704:0 (2a02:6b8:c14:2791:0:640:4704:0 [2a02:6b8:c14:2791:0:640:4704:0]) by sas2-6a1db1376cb6.qloud-c.yandex.net (mxbackcorp/Yandex) with HTTP id NRXQ8e0JgGk1-RRJSInbk; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 12:27:27 +0300
X-Yandex-Fwd: 2
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex-team.ru; s=default; t=1663147647; bh=uvxuAcdPrTy6ogGRDlIBJJPGJyQZdlWtkaNHfivY2Kk=; h=Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Date:References:To:From:Message-Id; b=LYF8wmAAAcJLzTvp/Z5SUq60vNxw8WUFXi6JTSP8qSvMYTv+E7sMInNLUqAA7xH+T 8zS4+PwkRd/A3v3mcC1TpyfP8sPpct8Yw5x1xjiK21HD8voU1oaNY6R+abf3+uNFed 4TgvwmdzyFSh/n5h15Jd6C91OuQCNayuXW9hI6K8=
Authentication-Results: sas2-6a1db1376cb6.qloud-c.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex-team.ru
Received: from ij3urkvf4buhbqq7.myt.yp-c.yandex.net (ij3urkvf4buhbqq7.myt.yp-c.yandex.net [2a02:6b8:c12:3b24:0:640:4e1a:0]) by myt6-79704c0e15e4.qloud-c.yandex.net (mxbackcorp/Yandex) with HTTP id 7RXNUf0Jca61-QMK5WjMy for <bhassanov@yandex-team.ru>; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 12:27:17 +0300
Received: by ij3urkvf4buhbqq7.myt.yp-c.yandex.net with HTTP; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 12:27:17 +0300
From: Boris Khasanov <bhassanov@yandex-team.ru>
To: Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com>, "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Cc: "draft-li-pce-pcep-srv6-yang@ietf.org" <draft-li-pce-pcep-srv6-yang@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAP7zK5Z3oK6rzuh1nmhrDZkovbQG2r1MkO4DhgaP2MSdYN09eQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAP7zK5Z3oK6rzuh1nmhrDZkovbQG2r1MkO4DhgaP2MSdYN09eQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Yamail [ http://yandex.ru ] 5.0
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 12:27:27 +0300
Message-Id: <51631663147302@mail.yandex-team.ru>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/4A82pB51CQ1a7Scuc6mbCaqNXNc>
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-li-pce-pcep-srv6-yang-07
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 09:27:38 -0000

Hi Dhruv and all,
 
I read the draft and support its adoption.  There were several important comments (i.e. from Gyan and others) which should be considered later on (including those dependencies).
I am more concerned about the corresponding  work on ietf-pce-multipath and especially on ietf-spring-sr-policy-yang which is frozen for quite long time already.
 
SY,
Boris
 
02.09.2022, 12:10, "Dhruv Dhody" <dd@dhruvdhody.com>:
Hi WG,

This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-li-pce-pcep-srv6-yang-07.
 
 
Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the list.

Please respond by Monday 19th Sept 2022.
 
Please be more vocal during WG polls! 

Thanks!
Dhruv & Julien
,

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce