IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-li-pce-pcep-srv6-yang-07

Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> Tue, 06 September 2022 14:07 UTC

Return-Path: <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84420C1522B9; Tue, 6 Sep 2022 07:07:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.094
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.094 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hc6JWt6iXnpv; Tue, 6 Sep 2022 07:06:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x529.google.com (mail-ed1-x529.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::529]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6603C1522B2; Tue, 6 Sep 2022 07:06:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x529.google.com with SMTP id s11so15289244edd.13; Tue, 06 Sep 2022 07:06:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=PNZ3pQ7pM7iR+9diNmezCofEY5C7RLgklenPtbvVdi8=; b=lTRtJhbSjE1e6t5giqcvUDNMznfVgHuke9/jNoz/62DGzvr+uSRM9c1SxyXx4tK7qP acXXRsBGP/0CvrTh1q9OPK09H/ogqODceM6uhG8hi/fxBK+k9t/F5xswsggaEkd5sSWl O3HGGUacQ0GcxBms76uSXpBVHC14rgtB6m9Mtrna5+WI6+RPHjC06KghCika2NyDFRc/ jIrjFByeY3xd7jrEOpScXPzeDERcvmNaiHmfiS4C+AFw4mU+CmTxbubtgpj9e9n91RGT S8qw68EzYoqIFtKgTZdI8D48/UkBaQx4vHWtRyONCaaCSVyp0hI/Q1c/6jP0Ac17S73i AkiA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=PNZ3pQ7pM7iR+9diNmezCofEY5C7RLgklenPtbvVdi8=; b=2GBpTwmu7WodeRZc5OpteqPywnnYuesiHllHxDtjjzCd/VVslcioY1iaoHRzgd3Yjm fxo8kV/7wUpVntVidnrNgYslRqUAzUKScTiY45XfOAoPbKNNrnearGKPK+zBg5cpFSo0 TI68t2x5dFehDHwKZ/ObacnKhJ2/p766Qrv631CZZ55879N+UeVkYjydIPKqo2sbg5Pi AWAPK3IdtDzBWBlByrF6SEU0JoeJXle0AjChSdCedKfqy2G1z0U2NYEAkamNKtWNMn86 CyBpAduiNe3lK//vtP+NbtrvocBuHwsUvtfsReTWy6JDxbYCY5pjEwzyluJynxbYOk0Y p2nQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo0twl94aKJCUOOPx26lSkpr9tbbPs2QevBn/iSfQLyWQp2rI8pv or7LIKF700KWZjOvArmBx4J859BuBljUO+hADWW3DG18
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR6A2MpH29vKgXUGv8dktByobAMBHJAwhckG+rFIJS8fmW4fLinpoRxohuHWz5gQXZC/f9K5hWyLbORC3lAbnFA=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:3586:b0:44e:c11b:8062 with SMTP id y6-20020a056402358600b0044ec11b8062mr4055130edc.356.1662473218092; Tue, 06 Sep 2022 07:06:58 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAP7zK5Z3oK6rzuh1nmhrDZkovbQG2r1MkO4DhgaP2MSdYN09eQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAP7zK5Z3oK6rzuh1nmhrDZkovbQG2r1MkO4DhgaP2MSdYN09eQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2022 10:06:47 -0400
Message-ID: <CABNhwV0KPe2gi1xUp3ov5UxmA4Ttwje8hNw9HWdtBKffech21A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com>
Cc: draft-li-pce-pcep-srv6-yang@ietf.org, pce@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009cf68b05e802b51b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/WQ81FC-ANv4b7SAw1KIyqzxiutg>
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-li-pce-pcep-srv6-yang-07
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2022 14:07:03 -0000

This draft is very useful for operators deploying SRv6 and I support
adoption.

Should the Yang model include all SRv6 endpoint behaviors defined in RFC
8986 SRv6 programming?

Also should the draft include RFC 9252 SRv6 BGP overlay service and
transposition scheme details as well as SRv6 load balancing?

As well should the draft include SRv6 compression Next uSID and Replace
G-SID endpoint behaviors?

Thanks

Gyan

On Fri, Sep 2, 2022 at 5:10 AM Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com> wrote:

> Hi WG,
>
> This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-li-pce-pcep-srv6-yang-07.
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-pce-pcep-srv6-yang/
>
> Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons -
> Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you
> willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the list.
>
> Please respond by Monday 19th Sept 2022.
>
> Please be more vocal during WG polls!
>
> Thanks!
> Dhruv & Julien
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
>
-- 

<http://www.verizon.com/>

*Gyan Mishra*

*Network Solutions A**rchitect *

*Email gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com <gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com>*



*M 301 502-1347*

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email