Re: [pcp] single port PANA+PCP

["Dan Wing" <[e-mail]>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Margaret Wasserman [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 5:45 AM
> To: Alper Yegin
> Cc: Dan Wing; 'Zhangdacheng (Dacheng)'; [e-mail];
> [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: single port PANA+PCP
> 
> 
> Hi Alper,
> 
> On Aug 9, 2012, at 5:31 AM, Alper Yegin wrote:
> > My understand is that there are two alternatives we are considering
> for using PANA for PCP authentication over the same PCP port:
> >
> > 1. Encapsulate PANA over PCP (e.g., define a dedicated PCP option
> that encapsulate PANA packet).
> > 2. Define a way to demux PANA and PCP even when they operate over the
> same port (no encapsulation).
> 
> Yes, these are the two PANA-based approaches we are considering.
> 
> Someone asked, at the end of the meeting, that we also keep the PCP-
> Specific approach in the document, so that we could compare all three
> approaches at the interim conference call, so we will do that, too,
> since it doesn't require any significant work.

That was me that asked.  We need all three with pro/con to understand
what value we get and what problems we solve.  

Thanks,
-d