Re: [pcp] single port PANA+PCP

["Dan Wing" <[e-mail]>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alper Yegin [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 2:32 AM
> To: Dan Wing
> Cc: 'Zhangdacheng (Dacheng)'; 'Margaret Wasserman'; hartmans@painless-
> security.com; [e-mail]
> Subject: single port PANA+PCP
> 
> > If the PCP server doesn't want authentication, I believe we can
> always
> > rely on a PCP error response if for PANA messages and for
> > PCP-encapsulated (tunneled) PANA messages (which I believe are the
> two
> > proposals being considered)
> 
> My understand is that there are two alternatives we are considering for
> using PANA for PCP authentication over the same PCP port:
> 
> 1. Encapsulate PANA over PCP (e.g., define a dedicated PCP option that
> encapsulate PANA packet).
> 2. Define a way to demux PANA and PCP even when they operate over the
> same port (no encapsulation).
> 
> Right?
> 
> I might have lost track, just seeking confirmation.

Yes, I believe those are the two approaches being considered.

-d