Re: [pcp] single port PANA+PCP

[Alper Yegin <[e-mail]>]

Hi Margaret,


> 
> Hi Alper,
> 
> On Aug 9, 2012, at 5:31 AM, Alper Yegin wrote:
>> My understand is that there are two alternatives we are considering for using PANA for PCP authentication over the same PCP port:
>> 
>> 1. Encapsulate PANA over PCP (e.g., define a dedicated PCP option that encapsulate PANA packet).
>> 2. Define a way to demux PANA and PCP even when they operate over the same port (no encapsulation).
> 
> Yes, these are the two PANA-based approaches we are considering.
> 
> Someone asked, at the end of the meeting, that we also keep the PCP-Specific approach in the document, so that we could compare all three approaches at the interim conference call, so we will do that, too, since it doesn't require any significant work.
> 


There was a clear decision at the meeting to go with a PANA-based solution, not with EAP-over-PCP solution. Given that the decision is already made, why do we need to keep other options still floating in the WG document?




> Margaret
> 
>