Re: [pcp] Fw:I-D Action: New Version Notification for draft-tsou-pcp-natcoord-08.txt

"Dan Wing" <dwing@cisco.com> Fri, 02 November 2012 02:07 UTC

Return-Path: <dwing@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4665821F98BD for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 19:07:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.549
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.549 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.050, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vlHvxO3WA9Nh for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 19:06:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mtv-iport-2.cisco.com (mtv-iport-2.cisco.com [173.36.130.13]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 873E921F983D for <pcp@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 19:06:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3779; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1351822019; x=1353031619; h=from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date: message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nObYleSPitY8aXDXk/Oi/TvdkKYl1NbbZ7V1J81xtfE=; b=W7cs+MAcdo9okfbBvoyioeh9xPcqKxojuo4aHfFqmEsAL1xkxIAT89BZ SijDIleACoJIiTmTwrjdh2p0+XAjRTtzSR5+RMlL30H+BR2+pc/KyfM0S lkHVLFA5uANMKqIYD+ghfgY/MhjyJli0MeX969/+Gk3xKyzT5TbzYPeWj o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgEFAEIqk1CrRDoG/2dsb2JhbABEhhe9GYEIgh4BAQEDAQEBAQUCCAEQBEcJAgUHAQMCCREEAQEBAgIjAwICGQgGHwkIAgQTCwUSh1IDCQUMnHONKYkNDYlUgSCJdGeFKIETA4hahReGMoFVgRuKF4MmgWuDDw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,696,1344211200"; d="scan'208";a="62926829"
Received: from mtv-core-1.cisco.com ([171.68.58.6]) by mtv-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 02 Nov 2012 02:06:58 +0000
Received: from DWINGWS01 ([10.32.240.194]) by mtv-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qA226whg017115; Fri, 2 Nov 2012 02:06:58 GMT
From: Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>
To: 'Qiong' <bingxuere@gmail.com>
References: <CAH3bfAAn79BdM+F9G2WkJwvwxo08y89Fa3D6VKRX6cOZu98FYA@mail.gmail.com> <0c8701cdb792$8ee8c4a0$acba4de0$@cisco.com> <CAH3bfABZOjVZqHzZ7PTJfQ5WQT0wUnbZRtMCoJJfVsMw==U8bQ@mail.gmail.com> <01ac01cdb840$0ef753c0$2ce5fb40$@cisco.com> <5092A3EB.2030500@viagenie.ca> <046101cdb872$e9c448f0$bd4cdad0$@cisco.com> <5092E3EF.7090308@viagenie.ca> <04a301cdb881$f26cc900$d7465b00$@cisco.com> <CAH3bfAAXMnZ6fqbhx8OA5ih7iUzLM1s6ZEmj1q=kWrxJN9AehQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAH3bfAAXMnZ6fqbhx8OA5ih7iUzLM1s6ZEmj1q=kWrxJN9AehQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2012 19:06:58 -0700
Message-ID: <056201cdb89e$bd681170$38383450$@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQNPFg3hnot8iaQn7dMg74vbEf4q5wHPoD1sAYkIPtMBOHUi3AFnS4+SAeZ6klcCPyvAawK69TaXAg3Oi0qUW86FgA==
Content-Language: en-us
Cc: pcp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [pcp] Fw:I-D Action: New Version Notification for draft-tsou-pcp-natcoord-08.txt
X-BeenThere: pcp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCP wg discussion list <pcp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pcp>
List-Post: <mailto:pcp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 02:07:00 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Qiong [mailto:bingxuere@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2012 5:11 PM
> To: Dan Wing
> Cc: Simon Perreault; pcp@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [pcp] Fw:I-D Action: New Version Notification for draft-
> tsou-pcp-natcoord-08.txt
> 
> Dear Dan,
> 
> The learned port-set is only for restricted NAT on IPv4 packet.
> MAP_PORT_SET is sent using native IPv6, and so there is no restriction
> on the port-range.

Oh.

The draft doesn't say the PCP messages are always sent over IPv6.  Or,
I can't find that sentence.

-d

> As Simon said, it can use any UDP port on the
> internal address it already has.
> 
> Thanks for your comments :)
> 
> Best wishes
> Qiong
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 6:40 AM, Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 	> -----Original Message-----
> 	> From: Simon Perreault [mailto:simon.perreault@viagenie.ca]
> 	> Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2012 2:05 PM
> 	> To: Dan Wing
> 	> Cc: pcp@ietf.org
> 	> Subject: Re: [pcp] Fw:I-D Action: New Version Notification for
> draft-
> 	> tsou-pcp-natcoord-08.txt
> 	>
> 
> 	> Le 2012-11-01 21:53, Dan Wing a écrit :
> 	> >> Le 2012-11-01 15:49, Dan Wing a écrit :
> 	> >>> Ok.  Which UDP port does the CPE send that PCP request, if it
> does
> 	> >>> not yet already know the port range assigned to the CPE?
> 	> >>
> 	> >> Uh?
> 	> >
> 	> > Sorry, I meant to ask:
> 	> >
> 	> >    *from* which UDP port does the CPE send that PCP request.
> 	> >
> 	> > or can it use any source UDP port for its PCP request, or does
> it have
> 	> > to be one of its assigned UDP ports (which aren't yet assigned
> until
> 	> > PCP exchange)?
> 	>
> 	> That's what I understood. And the answer is still the same:
> 	>
> 	> Q: From which UDP port does the CPE send a MAP request?
> 	> A: From any UDP port on the internal address it already has.
> 	>
> 	> Q: From which UDP port does the CPE send a MAP_PORT_SET request?
> 	> A: From any UDP port on the internal address it already has.
> 	>
> 	> There must be something else I'm not getting...
> 
> 
> 	If it doesn't get (learn) that UDP port via PCP, how does it
> 	learn it?
> 
> 	-d
> 
> 
> 
> 	> Simon
> 	>
> 	> >> MAP gives one port.
> 	> >> MAP_PORT_SET gives a set of ports.
> 	> >>
> 	> >> MAP and MAP_PORT_SET have the same answer to your question.
> 	> >>
> 	> >> Simon
> 	> >> --
> 	> >> DTN made easy, lean, and smart -->
> http://postellation.viagenie.ca
> 	> >> NAT64/DNS64 open-source        --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
> 	> >> STUN/TURN server               --> http://numb.viagenie.ca
> 	> >> _______________________________________________
> 	> >> pcp mailing list
> 	> >> pcp@ietf.org
> 	> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp
> 	> >
> 	>
> 	>
> 	> --
> 	> DTN made easy, lean, and smart -->
> http://postellation.viagenie.ca
> 	> NAT64/DNS64 open-source        --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
> 	> STUN/TURN server               --> http://numb.viagenie.ca
> 
> 	_______________________________________________
> 	pcp mailing list
> 	pcp@ietf.org
> 	https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> ==============================================
> Qiong Sun
> China Telecom Beijing Research Institude
> 
> 
> Open source code:
> lightweight 4over6: http://sourceforge.net/projects/laft6/
> PCP-natcoord: http://sourceforge.net/projects/pcpportsetdemo/
> ===============================================
> 
>