IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [pcp] Fw:I-D Action: New Version Notification for draft-tsou-pcp-natcoord-08.txt

"Dan Wing" <dwing@cisco.com> Thu, 01 November 2012 20:53 UTC

Return-Path: <dwing@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0795821F8660 for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 13:53:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.535
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.535 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.064, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id clkoCORQI1Mv for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 13:53:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mtv-iport-1.cisco.com (mtv-iport-1.cisco.com [173.36.130.12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A5F421F842A for <pcp@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 13:53:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1302; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1351803195; x=1353012795; h=from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vzYAkljBYPECxadHOs0E+m3BvSpE81Cd6HPpaBfs2XU=; b=fOryGBOGwf+nInWiScYUT+iZ5ZmzLdpjObOS+VgBG5mQMHLCjLC8RZAs sleFdUscRJviF4lqMkknMvQRJAwE6y5U+YtJ7Y7AFTbZQRCDg0ZOoDEbg Rn+VrdOjqlttQgbKh/EjZjurHZE129wYKtJdVjB5pvpgJF+dZR0vS6T4R Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhAKANzfklCrRDoH/2dsb2JhbABEwi8DgQWBCIIeAQEBAwEBAQEFAggBFEcJBwcBAwIJEQQBASgHGQ4fCQgCBAESCwUSh14FDJxfoC2Le3SFRwOIJTWFF4gHgRuNPYFrgw8
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,695,1344211200"; d="scan'208";a="59801217"
Received: from mtv-core-2.cisco.com ([171.68.58.7]) by mtv-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 01 Nov 2012 20:53:15 +0000
Received: from DWINGWS01 ([10.154.161.158]) by mtv-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qA1KrFh7025569; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 20:53:15 GMT
From: Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>
To: 'Simon Perreault' <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>, pcp@ietf.org
References: <CAH3bfAAn79BdM+F9G2WkJwvwxo08y89Fa3D6VKRX6cOZu98FYA@mail.gmail.com> <0c8701cdb792$8ee8c4a0$acba4de0$@cisco.com> <CAH3bfABZOjVZqHzZ7PTJfQ5WQT0wUnbZRtMCoJJfVsMw==U8bQ@mail.gmail.com> <01ac01cdb840$0ef753c0$2ce5fb40$@cisco.com> <5092A3EB.2030500@viagenie.ca>
In-Reply-To: <5092A3EB.2030500@viagenie.ca>
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2012 13:53:15 -0700
Message-ID: <046101cdb872$e9c448f0$bd4cdad0$@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQNPFg3hnot8iaQn7dMg74vbEf4q5wHPoD1sAYkIPtMBOHUi3AFnS4+SlKL18sA=
Content-Language: en-us
Subject: Re: [pcp] Fw:I-D Action: New Version Notification for draft-tsou-pcp-natcoord-08.txt
X-BeenThere: pcp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCP wg discussion list <pcp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pcp>
List-Post: <mailto:pcp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2012 20:53:16 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pcp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pcp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Simon Perreault
> Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2012 9:32 AM
> To: pcp@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [pcp] Fw:I-D Action: New Version Notification for draft-
> tsou-pcp-natcoord-08.txt
> 
> Just replying to this one because the others seem clear to me...
> 
> Le 2012-11-01 15:49, Dan Wing a écrit :
> > Ok.  Which UDP port does the CPE send that PCP request, if it does not
> > yet already know the port range assigned to the CPE?
> 
> Uh?

Sorry, I meant to ask:

  *from* which UDP port does the CPE send that PCP request.

or can it use any source UDP port for its PCP request, or does it have
to be one of its assigned UDP ports (which aren't yet assigned until
PCP exchange)?

-d


> MAP gives one port.
> MAP_PORT_SET gives a set of ports.
> 
> MAP and MAP_PORT_SET have the same answer to your question.
> 
> Simon
> --
> DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca
> NAT64/DNS64 open-source        --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
> STUN/TURN server               --> http://numb.viagenie.ca
> _______________________________________________
> pcp mailing list
> pcp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email