Re: [pcp] Fw:I-D Action: New Version Notification for draft-tsou-pcp-natcoord-08.txt

On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Zhouqian (Cathy) <cathy.zhou@huawei.com>wrote:

> Agree with Simon that the message could be sent over IPv4 as well.
> In this case, the message is sent using WAN side IPv4 address and the WAN
> side address
> should be planned well in advance.
>

Right. Address family doesn't matter, because in either IPv6 or IPv4 case,
PCP is as a means to obtain external IP plus port set information, other
than performing address assignment role.

Cheers,
Xiaohong

>
> Best Regards,
> Cathy
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: pcp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pcp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> > Simon Perreault
> > Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 2:10 PM
> > To: Dan Wing
> > Cc: pcp@ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: [pcp] Fw:I-D Action: New Version Notification for
> > draft-tsou-pcp-natcoord-08.txt
> >
> > Le 2012-11-02 03:06, Dan Wing a écrit :
> > > The draft doesn't say the PCP messages are always sent over IPv6.  Or,
> > > I can't find that sentence.
> >
> > It doesn't because it wouldn't be true. MAP_PORT_SET can be sent over
> > any address family, just like MAP.
> >
> > Remember: the only difference is that MAP gets one port, while
> > MAP_PORT_SET gets multiple ports.
> >
> > Simon
> > --
> > DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca
> > NAT64/DNS64 open-source        --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
> > STUN/TURN server               --> http://numb.viagenie.ca
> > _______________________________________________
> > pcp mailing list
> > pcp@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp
> _______________________________________________
> pcp mailing list
> pcp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp
>