[perpass] perpass: what next?

[Stephen Farrell <[e-mail]>]

Hiya,

I think this list has been really useful since we started it back
in August 2013. We initiated a bunch of new work on here (e.g. cfrg
curves, tcpinc, dprive, rfc7258) and I think the concerns dealt
with here have influenced lots of other work in the IETF as well.
Many thanks for all that great input and of course most of the
things above aren't finished, but even so, we're now looking for
some more great input:-)

The IESG will be meeting f2f in early May at our "retreat" and one
of the topics on that agenda is "where next with perpass" so your
ideas on that are very welcome.

Please discuss those here and/or send 'em to the IESG or to some
random AD or to me. But discussing 'em on this list is way better,
and of course even betterer is to write an I-D (and please do point
again at ones you've written, just to refresh folks' minds).

While I do have some ideas, I'd rather not skew the discussion by
throwing those out right now. I will also report back here after
the IESG discussion.

And just as a reminder, we've used this list mostly for very
initial discussions and seen all chunky items of work handled
elsewhere, be that in current WGs or by forming new WGs or
whatever. I think that's been a good mode of operation so far,
so we're not really asking here about how to change that, but
rather for discussion of which topics we can usefully try handle
in that same way over the coming year or two.

So, fire away...

Thanks,
S.