Re: [Pesci-discuss] iesg and newtrk

Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com> Fri, 18 November 2005 16:15 UTC

Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Ed8tv-0005jI-5k; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 11:15:47 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Ed8tt-0005j4-Pt for pesci-discuss@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 11:15:45 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA26469 for <pesci-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 11:15:11 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mtagate1.de.ibm.com ([195.212.29.150]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ed9Bl-000581-QR for pesci-discuss@ietf.org; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 11:34:14 -0500
Received: from d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.167.49]) by mtagate1.de.ibm.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id jAIGFbOL129292 for <pesci-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 16:15:37 GMT
Received: from d12av01.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12av01.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.165.212]) by d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VERS6.7) with ESMTP id jAIGFaOT231086 for <pesci-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 17:15:36 +0100
Received: from d12av01.megacenter.de.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d12av01.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jAIGFZAb021638 for <pesci-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 17:15:36 +0100
Received: from sihl.zurich.ibm.com (sihl.zurich.ibm.com [9.4.16.232]) by d12av01.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jAIGFZb8021624 for <pesci-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 17:15:35 +0100
Received: from zurich.ibm.com (sig-9-146-220-232.de.ibm.com [9.146.220.232]) by sihl.zurich.ibm.com (AIX4.3/8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA45274 for <pesci-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 17:15:34 +0100
Message-ID: <437DFE26.2050701@zurich.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 17:15:34 +0100
From: Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>
Organization: IBM
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113
X-Accept-Language: en, fr, de
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: pesci-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pesci-discuss] iesg and newtrk
References: <A504D37F23F3DDC12B8072FE@as-s2n.ietf64.ietf.org> <tsl1x1eq2e0.fsf@cz.mit.edu> <tslwtj6oa7q.fsf@cz.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <tslwtj6oa7q.fsf@cz.mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 4adaf050708fb13be3316a9eee889caa
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: pesci-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Process Evolution Study Committee of the IETF discussion <pesci-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss>, <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/pesci-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:pesci-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss>, <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: pesci-discuss-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: pesci-discuss-bounces@ietf.org

I must admit I've been in catch-up mode this week and put process
reform low in the heap, so I have thought about all this less
than Sam has. I'm also waiting for postable draft minutes to be
ready. But yes, we need to (a) be constructive (b) remember that
we got 300 documents processed in the last year, so more things
are working than an outside reader of this list might imagine and
(c) avoid getting further wrapped round our axles.

(c) involves trying to extract simple conclusions from a
complex discussion, and that's where I think we need to focus.

     Brian

Sam Hartman wrote:
> While I stand behind everything I said, I'll admit that my language
> was more emotional than needed.  I'm sorry about that.
> 
> I do believe that we need to treat each other as parties working
> together to solve common problems.  The IESG is trying to be as
> constructive as it knows how.  I believe those making proposals are
> trying to be constructive too.  If you don't think someone succeeded
> in being constructive, point it out and work with them to figure out
> what they meant to say or how they should say it.
> 
> Being constructive is not the same as agreeing.  Being constructive is
> sometimes not even the same as working to solve a problem.  I may
> honestly believe something is not a problem or believe it is not worth
> the time to solve.  Blocking others is not constructive but building a
> consensus against a particular process change can be.
> 
> 
> However many of the proposals are blocked.  We need to figure out how
> to unwedge them.  I've been thinking hard about this since pesci.  I
> hope to have a proposal soon; I'd like to talk it over with brian
> first.  Of course, he may well convince me it's a bad idea, and I may
> end up going back to the drawing board.
> 
> --Sam
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pesci-discuss mailing list
> Pesci-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss
> 


_______________________________________________
Pesci-discuss mailing list
Pesci-discuss@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss