Re: [pim] Publishing draft-ietf-pim-dr-improvement-08

<zhang.zheng@zte.com.cn> Wed, 09 October 2019 00:45 UTC

Return-Path: <zhang.zheng@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7A2C120048; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 17:45:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GI13-dtqqmCC; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 17:45:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxhk.zte.com.cn (mxhk.zte.com.cn [63.217.80.70]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4590B120046; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 17:45:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mse-fl2.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.30.14.239]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTPS id A6F4813236CD4C51311C; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 08:45:46 +0800 (CST)
Received: from njxapp03.zte.com.cn ([10.41.132.202]) by mse-fl2.zte.com.cn with SMTP id x990jZYV048480; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 08:45:35 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from zhang.zheng@zte.com.cn)
Received: from mapi (njxapp01[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid203; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 08:45:34 +0800 (CST)
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2019 08:45:34 +0800 (CST)
X-Zmail-TransId: 2af95d9d2daeb76abd41
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <201910090845345226440@zte.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: <CAHANBt+2tTBgcdh9sFtVeYqeyVPhUAC+iT05evu2EH+HmVON7Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: CAHANBtJygYq3-Nr6J3nqt16Ucwh1Np4EZj+MPMrz6HzxZe-uaA@mail.gmail.com, CAHANBt+2tTBgcdh9sFtVeYqeyVPhUAC+iT05evu2EH+HmVON7Q@mail.gmail.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: <zhang.zheng@zte.com.cn>
To: <stig@venaas.com>
Cc: <pim@ietf.org>, <draft-ietf-pim-dr-improvement@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====_001_next====="
X-MAIL: mse-fl2.zte.com.cn x990jZYV048480
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pim/-Feza2dcYdxGFBVvKv9GqDSD6uQ>
Subject: Re: [pim] =?utf-8?q?Publishing_draft-ietf-pim-dr-improvement-08?=
X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast <pim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pim/>
List-Post: <mailto:pim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2019 00:45:52 -0000

Hi Stig,






Very sorry for the late response because of the National Day holiday.


As co-author, I think this draft is ready to move ahead, and I don't know any other undisclosed IPR.






Thanks,


Sandy











原始邮件



发件人:StigVenaas <stig@venaas.com>
收件人:pim@ietf.org <pim@ietf.org>;draft-ietf-pim-dr-improvement@ietf.org <draft-ietf-pim-dr-improvement@ietf.org>rg>;
日 期 :2019年10月09日 06:06
主 题 :Re: Publishing draft-ietf-pim-dr-improvement-08




Hi

Looks that there are no concerns moving ahead with publication. Can
the authors, and any others that might know
anything about IPR, let us know if they are aware of any other IPR
claims than what has been filed already?

Stig

On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 11:18 AM Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> An earlier version of this draft passed WGLC many months ago. However,
> as discussed in the WG we agreed it should have some text pointing out
> how it relates to draft-mankamana-pim-bdr-02 that we are considering
> for adoption. This text has now been added, as well as some other
> minor changes.
>
> Please look at revision 08 and speak up if you have any concerns.
>
> Authors, and others, please let us know if you are aware of any other
> IPR claims than the one that already has been filed.
>
> I'll wait a week or so to give people a chance to respond. We need at
> least all the authors to respond regarding IPR before proceeding
> though.
>
> Thanks,
> Stig