Re: [pim] Publishing draft-ietf-pim-dr-improvement-08

"Mankamana Mishra (mankamis)" <mankamis@cisco.com> Mon, 14 October 2019 20:53 UTC

Return-Path: <mankamis@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CBDD12003E; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 13:53:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=iKVY2gmZ; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=AvpQoNNc
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uFOgpntqLf6B; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 13:53:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32933120045; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 13:53:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1176; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1571086422; x=1572296022; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=UW6Vdl8HTzuz60elGpY2ytnkg8NWXSNGC4G3c1O6p6w=; b=iKVY2gmZ42LegKDtAwI5EIfYe8sHA5hlm58PSg1cJM7mVDK3bhXJvsnD Ip12b9MI7q8CqO2Sk293bt0laGOVWGoItgTAcrNkFB55uZsXVzMmmRFIq FZM9tmZA5z6aCJ4PvMmrtJ0DTo/ImN4zivnWtB5PV6f6Qc23Q0rPj74lX s=;
IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3A9TRPnh2kfYQ+K/bCsmDT+zVfbzU7u7jyIg8e44?= =?us-ascii?q?YmjLQLaKm44pD+JxKGt+51ggrPWoPWo7JfhuzavrqoeFRI4I3J8RVgOIdJSw?= =?us-ascii?q?dDjMwXmwI6B8vQDET9L/fvbjcSF8VZX1gj9Ha+YgBY?=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0AKAAAK36Rd/4sNJK1mGgEBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQMBAQEBEQEBAQICAQEBAYFnBQEBAQELAYFKUAWBQyAECyqEJINHA4RYhXG?= =?us-ascii?q?CNyWXfoEugSQDVAkBAQEMAQEtAgEBhEACF4JHJDQJDgIDCQEBBAEBAQIBBQR?= =?us-ascii?q?thS0MhUsBAQEBAgESEREMAQE3AQQLAgEIGAICJgICAjAVEAIEDgUigwCCRwM?= =?us-ascii?q?OIAECpQUCgTiIYXWBMoJ9AQEFhQoYghcJgQwoAYUShnsYgUA/gTgME4JMPoR?= =?us-ascii?q?Egw4ygiyPODedWAqCIpUZG5Vzg02nZAIEAgQFAg4BAQWBUjmBWHAVZQGCQVA?= =?us-ascii?q?QFIFPg3OKU3SBKZAlAQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.67,296,1566864000"; d="scan'208";a="559037327"
Received: from alln-core-6.cisco.com ([173.36.13.139]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 14 Oct 2019 20:53:41 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-012.cisco.com (xch-aln-012.cisco.com [173.36.7.22]) by alln-core-6.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x9EKrfPG015726 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 14 Oct 2019 20:53:41 GMT
Received: from xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) by XCH-ALN-012.cisco.com (173.36.7.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 15:53:40 -0500
Received: from xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) by xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 16:53:39 -0400
Received: from NAM01-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (173.37.151.57) by xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 15:53:39 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=fryAjX/ZEiiF5WLuy9w7BY3gRToY4fNOZaONSPcE86zyZtYE4LiEQ/TLBSR2F+DxW80WgFWYBV2TsewAGfz+lejabJjgcsiIxE2JcVAkGwIzjxKRDKW+g0U9Ph2hKAnZbxKb03MeqpGOFWPgmgNK69XjC3vZzno2iuMds/C7fbNxda3aorBKY7425t56zatiCUPMVsgyy37oKPOsntwsn7NC8CUZMvPS5NiVlMsgpVF569PfuCZtAzbNIk+ICFXSLQ/SNZzH37aiOcf7MjZUpiPChmChaQr/vRdUunbTz/7W6iOYA+dQUNspD++mbEvHQXRZXSbpDii05422T53tKQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=UW6Vdl8HTzuz60elGpY2ytnkg8NWXSNGC4G3c1O6p6w=; b=cAQpAnJUD0HjgX8ncctOPjOOAseul7WOwD66dgvdiBSrLMCx2qLmrF0mB3jUvDywDG8eF+vxQwYo1j++gvFyUDxhjSH1YFk23cLlIj/46JUt0mtBNEaEq1JlWArGpguLDrO2FQFgsUanVFnSYggHpb4L6LErWgPW4pLOUkePy1cRW8cb2wcVtCweaOyYMTxDF3xjV5NLquUCBg4aL3E0kNeAIOFcULnd6NtUz2vROUQZ9RsXU90NOl1AxUmyX/AEwIa5QmeTkTIBPLX/PC7Hwr83W8cvHaHSt32p67rIA6Q4CLGp/o/u3SpYJQRspWtFcF+KSP4v196jIG8YdYLbYg==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=UW6Vdl8HTzuz60elGpY2ytnkg8NWXSNGC4G3c1O6p6w=; b=AvpQoNNc9w0J5dLa7vstLsV+2yruW6e7ADsRiFPRlmR0hI2QKWtRsR5EBVff9GEGv35fMbdB403uhQxTDf8MAbLj3vFFkkymPldMs0uxdFtfW5ewIdvnOoVSXvAa2V14pOzG0Cs1EJsfdgZ+5PugCybWU8oBsnIJhYLX3iaFKnM=
Received: from BYAPR11MB3685.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.178.238.14) by BYAPR11MB3623.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.178.236.215) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2347.16; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 20:53:38 +0000
Received: from BYAPR11MB3685.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::cd94:b691:3e22:3f0a]) by BYAPR11MB3685.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::cd94:b691:3e22:3f0a%2]) with mapi id 15.20.2347.023; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 20:53:38 +0000
From: "Mankamana Mishra (mankamis)" <mankamis@cisco.com>
To: Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com>
CC: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>, "zhang.zheng" <zhang.zheng@zte.com.cn>, "xu.benchong@zte.com.cn" <xu.benchong@zte.com.cn>, "draft-ietf-pim-dr-improvement@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-pim-dr-improvement@ietf.org>, "pim@ietf.org" <pim@ietf.org>, Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [pim] Publishing draft-ietf-pim-dr-improvement-08
Thread-Index: AQHVgsacEb13+iz6DUKBavDrMB7UxKdamPiAgAAEYYA=
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 20:53:38 +0000
Message-ID: <B1A78E6F-5403-41C4-AC84-56DBD494278E@cisco.com>
References: <CAHANBtJBk1CDtOnBDmjXPU4x-BZJSs93OYj6b07aAGSggg5mAw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHANBtJBk1CDtOnBDmjXPU4x-BZJSs93OYj6b07aAGSggg5mAw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=mankamis@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2607:fb90:b276:7345:8ded:584d:be13:28d7]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 7e47c6ed-7d02-40ee-f725-08d750e896a5
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BYAPR11MB3623:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BYAPR11MB3623FDEFA83377C8F29A88E9DF900@BYAPR11MB3623.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 01901B3451
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(376002)(396003)(366004)(136003)(39860400002)(346002)(189003)(199004)(14454004)(53546011)(6436002)(71200400001)(71190400001)(76116006)(8936002)(256004)(186003)(102836004)(86362001)(6116002)(91956017)(8676002)(66946007)(81156014)(81166006)(478600001)(6246003)(6486002)(36756003)(6512007)(66476007)(64756008)(66446008)(66556008)(9886003)(229853002)(316002)(76176011)(486006)(4326008)(6916009)(99286004)(7736002)(305945005)(476003)(2906002)(33656002)(11346002)(2616005)(6506007)(5660300002)(446003)(54906003)(46003)(4744005)(25786009); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BYAPR11MB3623; H:BYAPR11MB3685.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: SIpnYPxGa/bkYdSjhxSyiTlVbT8KraDjvWJTHGRKZh1gcGATmMygG3UGuOTSy4NoyhJOm9iI8yYDM9pKj8ny87jNj6PjA2amJICnIqTfLZjgRaZlPGK6wcxGvaRYe7C68YZd2b3OafLtaNiAHPgcFdTOcUjtoVcZHNgJTMthDDTyc20Pg2VWGmoDid9m5wQPoRXtesAHsZPXf5aRnx+S2TihntARvyjLhD1c4RQcsbLhq4zjetgQ2J+hf89YwES6idJTuNayk2ev7Tdr4fXd0w4R4hiLSgHA5XbCpz65lGMdgOwIHpGkuE3biev/ng6SjywgEl+vkshwzzwire4AZ9nhkzTR9VHvSCh/5mNUykFTAKoF8ZvVikV9DoVhxk8twnJLogGVUjs6M2Mn4hzVBHUBm6lPpDvM3ILTSq5ibeE=
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <CF5A58236A6C294B9F26F8A23C25AEC4@cisco.onmicrosoft.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 7e47c6ed-7d02-40ee-f725-08d750e896a5
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 14 Oct 2019 20:53:38.3969 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: FhclFUT2YSuDZkbsaRDagsnIzbyixDAVrL5OKe42tlefbAHIcYsP49k4PLEhGiT6M5EG/WSux3jg1zqPq+BR7w==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BYAPR11MB3623
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.22, xch-aln-012.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-6.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pim/wZI9uqOlJ2SOUQAMZlRRuyeYygA>
Subject: Re: [pim] Publishing draft-ietf-pim-dr-improvement-08
X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast <pim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pim/>
List-Post: <mailto:pim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 20:53:45 -0000

Hi Gyan 
As working group member I think we should still going ahead with publishing this document . Any subsequent behavior can be covered in independent document . We can work offline on that . 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Oct 14, 2019, at 13:38, Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi
> 
> Gyan, are you OK with this draft being published as is, or do you
> think there are any issues that need to be addressed?
> 
> Regarding BFD, it might be worth having a document specifically
> discussing how BFD may be used with pim. There are many
> implementations using BFD with pim, but I don't think we have any
> documents explaining exactly how that is done, except for
> draft-ietf-pim-bfd-p2mp-use-case, but it doesn't go into detail on the
> pim behavior, and it is discussed in the context of p2mp BFD.
> 
> Regards,
> Stig