Re: [provreg] New Version Notification for draft-brown-epp-fees-01.txt

Seth Goldman <sethamin@google.com> Fri, 02 May 2014 16:26 UTC

Return-Path: <sethamin@google.com>
X-Original-To: provreg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: provreg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 717751A084B for <provreg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 May 2014 09:26:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.729
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.729 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 72NnfXiXD1kC for <provreg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 May 2014 09:26:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x232.google.com (mail-ie0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::232]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78B1B1A08DA for <provreg@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 May 2014 09:26:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f178.google.com with SMTP id lx4so5399738iec.37 for <provreg@ietf.org>; Fri, 02 May 2014 09:26:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=U+OnKc6UwRUcy0lFIDLsGJw8Gp6uNX1M6lIvUfxT3Is=; b=M/XeEJOI4biSWsadN+6un4oJTf+tBwKIvSLAvZVin4483MBf6YWzl/OvnG/bCoGJ4q ZAC01Nx8M27l6s+nCQ20H3OTUjIf/UdMRt9xH+12a1zV2dWdCpdHgh1oamaagGJ3Vonq sVb8/ZHU60/LbFVnouoVVrDmoF8tHOJq+2fXaMo/WVI3dR24EIMg6T12wW6Ty+BvUz0O C+WEvJNfXdMDaVjPyffvgBB0EjxskYukFbW/xJg8EzZB8uNUQPvEyuVjonWhuAZLdadm Ni8BSopyPWicOGTCkQjB3sgQGhVzv8YpRFJnUcNgGdVyfQpmyL63PYtVb+GFx/shpvMZ cRrA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=U+OnKc6UwRUcy0lFIDLsGJw8Gp6uNX1M6lIvUfxT3Is=; b=KKRJC784COANJgygzYZU6okQSWzS4o3VwBvvIo+EBYiwezxUbNUwAXipB2KLrMZid7 NGRhNLwlPFdF4DFNRXGhetI57qsBfoBApOO2wGIut2SKZjqcexofgbklQ/LxxlXp7ujU NaTtGDfvRvYQEMyoS2E/YFXgtjWRNo3IcPO50UoyfMQS4AMZPffR4zutMTSr+JyGyZr+ /Y4cQaczRsCaBoKsJbPdgLFmp7DL7sfEHhL9mRpMYjwSzAr8dVtKGRJZXw+5cJhawQRZ A07JIM/1VY1MWDdcml+7o/iaZiTUnFhXzZ0iwrPBruH+fq9UTM3pzuJmKvNyuG5nagqF glKg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn7F14AoQaHw9lj1DHT2AIT9/tkyXaTUw9jg5zGif55Vu96lzYWMXGEVme4BGn9O9rnOIy+
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.22.37 with SMTP id a5mr5654445igf.30.1399047975067; Fri, 02 May 2014 09:26:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.64.108.229 with HTTP; Fri, 2 May 2014 09:26:14 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <326D3600-7F74-4D00-8F2B-A346C2A721B1@isc.org>
References: <CF7FD1F2.5DB6E%jgould@verisign.com> <53628077.8070402@centralnic.com> <CADJsPYwLj3uPCU=VenL2rVYkf7ZeD7=TXHjevL2WRgC44Vwx_g@mail.gmail.com> <ADB9498D-943E-41D3-B357-CE96C4348530@mwyoung.ca> <326D3600-7F74-4D00-8F2B-A346C2A721B1@isc.org>
Date: Fri, 02 May 2014 12:26:14 -0400
Message-ID: <CAAHh_-KcsGhfC_=_rCnRAfsGdOUYmFiuVx8qvv-v_LbMhWaw_A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Seth Goldman <sethamin@google.com>
To: Luis Muñoz <lem@isc.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b10c99194037204f86d3dd7"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/provreg/hVz2QRenDR_mEKZ7bjJNASMW_og
Cc: "provreg@ietf.org" <provreg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [provreg] New Version Notification for draft-brown-epp-fees-01.txt
X-BeenThere: provreg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: EPP discussion list <provreg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/provreg>, <mailto:provreg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/provreg/>
List-Post: <mailto:provreg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:provreg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg>, <mailto:provreg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 May 2014 16:26:19 -0000

I think this could be modeled by having extensible custom types on each "
*fee"* element, or maybe on each "*cd"* element. I would be hesitant to
embed too much application logic into the protocol, and instead just make
the schema flexible enough to model different scenarios.


On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Luis Muñoz <lem@isc.org> wrote:

>
> On May 1, 2014, at 11:52 AM, MICHAEL W YOUNG <michael@mwyoung.ca> wrote:
>
> > It would be interesting to query a given domain for an answer on which
> programs its applicable for.  Lets say I am a registrar that signed up for
> marketing programs (out of registry band) "A1" and program "B2" with the
> registry operator, instead of keeping track of that in my registrar
> systems, whenever I go to check pricing on a domain, I would also receive
> any current programs that are applicable to that domain along with the base
> pricing I originally queried.  I can then do subsequent lookups on the
> program pricing if I don't have the program pricing handy, or if the
> program pricing varies depending on the specific string.
>
> Why not return the pricing associated to each program in the same
> transaction? That would save on queries and I think it's a fair assumption
> that server-side looking up the list of programs will also provide the
> relevant pricing information with the same effort.
>
> Best regards
>
> -lem
>
> _______________________________________________
> provreg mailing list
> provreg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg
>