Re: [PSAMP] PSAMP-INFO IE realtiveError

Paul Aitken <paitken@cisco.com> Thu, 14 August 2008 13:47 UTC

Return-Path: <psamp-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: psamp-archive@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-psamp-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7646F3A6B7E; Thu, 14 Aug 2008 06:47:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: psamp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: psamp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 062D03A6999 for <psamp@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Aug 2008 06:47:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TQN1XnLyRRSs for <psamp@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Aug 2008 06:47:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ams-iport-1.cisco.com (ams-iport-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.140]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A914A3A6405 for <psamp@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Aug 2008 06:47:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.32,210,1217808000"; d="scan'208";a="17166990"
Received: from ams-dkim-2.cisco.com ([144.254.224.139]) by ams-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 14 Aug 2008 13:47:22 +0000
Received: from ams-core-1.cisco.com (ams-core-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.150]) by ams-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m7EDlM9r031999; Thu, 14 Aug 2008 15:47:22 +0200
Received: from cisco.com (mrwint.cisco.com [64.103.71.48]) by ams-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m7EDlM2n029732; Thu, 14 Aug 2008 13:47:22 GMT
Received: from [10.61.81.108] (ams3-vpn-dhcp4461.cisco.com [10.61.81.108]) by cisco.com (8.11.7p3+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id m7EDlLp14607; Thu, 14 Aug 2008 14:47:21 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <48A4376C.30708@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 14:47:24 +0100
From: Paul Aitken <paitken@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-GB; rv:1.8.1.16) Gecko/20080702 SeaMonkey/1.1.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Andrew Johnson <andrjohn@cisco.com>
References: DEFANGED[22027]:<804B13F8F3D94A4AB18B9B01ACB68FA101F5A5F9@EXCHSRV.fokus.fraunhofer.de> <489AB8F2.2050800@cisco.com> <804B13F8F3D94A4AB18B9B01ACB68FA101F5A810@EXCHSRV.fokus.fraunhofer.de> <489C52A7.6050907@cisco.com> <804B13F8F3D94A4AB18B9B01ACB68FA101F5A819@EXCHSRV.fokus.frau " " nhofer.de> <1218208442.9068.45.camel@localhost> <804B13F8F3D94A4AB18B9B01ACB68FA101F5A81C@EXCHSRV.fokus.fraunhofer.de> <1218221293.9068.61.camel@localhost> <804B13F8F3D94A4AB18B9B01ACB68FA101F5A821@EXCHSRV.fokus.fraunhofer.de> <1218665578.9426.10.camel@localhost> <804B13F8F3D94A4AB18B9B01ACB68FA101F5AA39@EXCHSRV.fokus.fraunhofer.de> <547F018265F92642B577B986577D671C2A5471@VENUS.office> <1218721021.9426.57.camel@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <1218721021.9426.57.camel@localhost>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=1025; t=1218721642; x=1219585642; c=relaxed/simple; s=amsdkim2001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=paitken@cisco.com; z=From:=20Paul=20Aitken=20<paitken@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[PSAMP]=20PSAMP-INFO=20IE=20realtiveErr or |Sender:=20; bh=ygSwt/iHxZZJYPfNM6hzkKiz62jSuBh4taTUfNcav3c=; b=MLO7HOGL9IQu5CKf8mJR1dVGDhvXxgMJ+kS7sg6TG/op/ccmokZ8+/z1h9 nvtjNUdcKpmTxDleLoKB/F6umC44Xd9ElBdFNZgD99Sb8/gTVlTw6EPf6/Af VDs2eNos1W;
Authentication-Results: ams-dkim-2; header.From=paitken@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/amsdkim2001 verified; );
Cc: psamp <psamp@ietf.org>, "Zseby, Tanja" <Tanja.Zseby@fokus.fraunhofer.de>, Juergen Quittek <Quittek@nw.neclab.eu>
Subject: Re: [PSAMP] PSAMP-INFO IE realtiveError
X-BeenThere: psamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This mailing list is used for discussion within the IETF packet sampling \(PSAMP\) WG" <psamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/psamp>, <mailto:psamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/psamp>
List-Post: <mailto:psamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:psamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/psamp>, <mailto:psamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: psamp-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: psamp-bounces@ietf.org

Andrew,

> I don't think much has changed.  If I filter out the misunderstandings I
> think you get something like this:
> 
> Tanja:    What's this fixedError thing for?
> Paul:     It's the uncertainty of the measurement expressed as a fixed
>           amount of the measured units.
> Tanja:    That's a confusing name, let's call it absoluteError.
> Everyone: OK.
> Tanja:    Why do we even need relativeError then?
> Andrew:   I think it might be useful for certain measurement devices.
> Tanja:    OK, well keep it if you want.
> 
> 
> In conclusion, fixedError is now called absoluteError and we'll keep
> relativeError in case it's needed.
> 
> For those who followed the thread, does that sound fair?

Yes.


Tanja,

> I agree. But I also would add the confidence boundaries levels and the
> small changes in PSAMP-PROTO as suggested in my first mail. 
> But those changes were mainly agreed by the authors, correct? 

Yes.


-- 
Paul Aitken
Cisco Systems Ltd, Edinburgh, Scotland.
_______________________________________________
PSAMP mailing list
PSAMP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/psamp