Re: [PWE3] OAM Msg Mapping Drafts

"Andrew G. Malis" <amalis@gmail.com> Fri, 25 July 2008 16:48 UTC

Return-Path: <pwe3-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: pwe3-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-pwe3-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BAF93A6B10; Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:48:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: pwe3@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pwe3@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCD6E3A6B01 for <pwe3@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:48:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L9+8b27Z87pu for <pwe3@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:48:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com (yw-out-2324.google.com [74.125.46.29]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF8BF3A6AEC for <pwe3@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:48:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 3so1316674ywj.49 for <pwe3@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:48:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=7m0r6EoWRkJUhQN9e5OEtvuLOFhVOM2YTziAJoyurNI=; b=RJaZvrzHBUVBGxUbNTQYuqiV8W4DNoEnwAIGkN/hkn9ONTjrPV6FvrKvI9e2JvoKIe qU7mDobHrSyLR6BKUVrYkAJhh9l39qsaeSe/ImIHtAZLBV/tIuFWmK0kl+uz29fH3M9C fT545Qecp+j4S+bq7HtyOLKaLlAg+rrIsKxjU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=AFAJMFzhbUnQ4KqjUztmYEfLivpiqYo35EeqDCmH+XcOgZ9iBp0gtLtA6bz3LIDO9h tN9iT4w9NPpmbErBGoDBMmXrNn1HENduN2YoCYuKtXaiBnS0/W150fAEWcPex2L0WoSC x7GM9P6L+P4dE0w93ZSvMniVdb6f8qW5gso2M=
Received: by 10.142.177.5 with SMTP id z5mr608253wfe.248.1217004484534; Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:48:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.142.88.14 with HTTP; Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:48:04 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <b2d141720807250948t6d602843k8bd49b8e7b323aaf@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 12:48:04 -0400
From: "Andrew G. Malis" <amalis@gmail.com>
To: stbryant@cisco.com, pwe3 <pwe3@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <4889E042.2090404@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <4889E042.2090404@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [PWE3] OAM Msg Mapping Drafts
X-BeenThere: pwe3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Pseudo Wires Edge to Edge <pwe3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/pwe3>
List-Post: <mailto:pwe3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: pwe3-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: pwe3-bounces@ietf.org

Stewart,

I strongly support option a.

Thanks,
Andy



On 7/25/08, Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com> wrote:
>
> We had hoped to resolve this face to face before
> the PWE3 meeting next week but that now looks
> unlikely. We are  concerned that we need to
> resolve this without the issue absorbing all
> of the time in the WG meeting.
>
> In order to gauge the consensus of the WG we would
> would like to ask some questions.
>
> When considering how to approach the message mapping
> document issue, we think that the most important
> considerations are:
>
> 1) That we deliver a high quality document that describes
>     the design to the implementors and users.
>
> 2) That the Ethernet design is fully reviewed.
>
> 3) That there is consistency between the approaches used
>     for the various OAM mappings.
>
> 4) That the Ethernet design is delivered in an expedited
>     manner and the ATM and FR designs are also delivered
>     in a timely manner.
>
>
> We have three approaches:
>
> a) LC and publish draft-ietf-pwe3-oam-msg-map-06.txt, and
>
>     Accept draft-mohan-pwe3-mpls-eth-oam-iwk as
>     a WG document
>
> b) LC and publish draft-ietf-pwe3-oam-msg-map-07.txt
>     (i.e. Luca's rewrite) but without  the Ethernet
>     section, and
>
>     Accept draft-mohan-pwe3-mpls-eth-oam-iwk as a WG
>     document
>
> c) Use publish draft-ietf-pwe3-oam-msg-map-07.txt  as
>     the basis for ongoing work.
>
> Before any document is sent to the IESG for publication
> we will ensure contributions are appropriately acknowledged
> through  editorship, authorship, & acknowledgments. So
> please set any such issues aside and focus on the best
> document to deliver to our users.
>
> Please also set aside the poor etiquette that has taken
> place, and  focus on  how best to deliver  the required
> documentation to the community. On the basis of
> considerations 1..4 above, which documentation
> approach, a, b or c, do you consider most likely to
> achieve the goals of the WG?
>
>
> Stewart & Matthew
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pwe3 mailing list
> pwe3@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3
>
_______________________________________________
pwe3 mailing list
pwe3@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3