IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: [PWOT] mpls-in-ip

"tom worster" <tom@ennovatenetworks.com> Tue, 27 February 2001 23:12 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id SAA04525 for <pwot-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 18:12:59 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA04376; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 18:09:04 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA04345 for <pwot@ns.ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 18:09:01 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ennovatenetworks.com ([63.102.148.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id SAA04451 for <pwot@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 18:08:57 -0500 (EST)
Received: from tworster (dhcp114.tst.ennovatenetworks.com [10.1.3.114]) by ennovatenetworks.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id SAA14200; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 18:07:41 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from tom@ennovatenetworks.com)
From: tom worster <tom@ennovatenetworks.com>
To: 'Alan Hannan' <alan@routingloop.com>
Cc: ceot@laurelnetworks.com, pwot@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [PWOT] mpls-in-ip
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 18:07:49 -0500
Message-ID: <016101c0a112$1b726920$7203010a@ennovatenetworks.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
In-Reply-To: <20010227120741.A1599@routingloop.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Importance: Normal
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: pwot-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: pwot-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <pwot.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: pwot@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

> Thus spake tom worster (tom@ennovatenetworks.com)
>  on or about Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 02:51:12PM -0500:
> > 
> > from what i've heard, the extra overhead is not
> > tolerable in some important apps, e.g. voip
> > and 3g. but over the core gre is an option.
> 
>   Does your statement assert that all important
>   applications are not tolerable using IP/MPLS/GRE/*
>   or just some?

like i thusly spake, some.

c u
fsb

_______________________________________________
pwot mailing list
pwot@ietf.org
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwot

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email