Re: [PWOT] mpls-in-ip

Kireeti Kompella <kireeti@juniper.net> Tue, 27 February 2001 19:26 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id OAA25254 for <pwot-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 14:26:57 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA00189; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 14:13:58 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA00158 for <pwot@ns.ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 14:13:57 -0500 (EST)
Received: from red.juniper.net (red.juniper.net [207.17.136.137]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id OAA24648 for <pwot@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 14:13:55 -0500 (EST)
Received: from kummer.juniper.net (kummer.juniper.net [172.17.12.90]) by red.juniper.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA20623; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 11:12:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from kireeti@localhost) by kummer.juniper.net (8.8.8/8.7.3) id LAA25628; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 11:12:48 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 11:12:48 -0800
From: Kireeti Kompella <kireeti@juniper.net>
Message-Id: <200102271912.LAA25628@kummer.juniper.net>
To: ceot@laurelnetworks.com, pwot@ietf.org, tom@ennovatenetworks.com
Subject: Re: [PWOT] mpls-in-ip
In-Reply-To: <00ba01c0a0db$95e74ea0$7203010a@ennovatenetworks.com>
Sender: pwot-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: pwot-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <pwot.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: pwot@ietf.org

> should mpls-in-ip be a standards track work item for pwot?

Isn't this a solved problem?  MPLS in GRE is trivial, implemented
and raring to be interop tested.

Kireeti.

_______________________________________________
pwot mailing list
pwot@ietf.org
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwot