IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [PWOT] mpls-in-ip

Alan Hannan <alan@routingloop.com> Tue, 27 February 2001 20:12 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id PAA27369 for <pwot-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 15:12:18 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA01548; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 15:08:12 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA01513 for <pwot@ns.ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 15:08:01 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ulysses.routingloop.com (root@c1297948-a.snvl1.sfba.home.com [65.3.196.186]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id PAA27201 for <pwot@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 15:07:59 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from alan@localhost) by ulysses.routingloop.com (8.10.0/8.10.0) id f1RK7g101619; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 12:07:42 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 12:07:41 -0800
From: Alan Hannan <alan@routingloop.com>
To: tom worster <tom@ennovatenetworks.com>
Cc: ceot@laurelnetworks.com, pwot@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [PWOT] mpls-in-ip
Message-ID: <20010227120741.A1599@routingloop.com>
References: <200102271912.LAA25628@kummer.juniper.net> <012001c0a0f6$a3a25e20$7203010a@ennovatenetworks.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i
In-Reply-To: <012001c0a0f6$a3a25e20$7203010a@ennovatenetworks.com>; from tom@ennovatenetworks.com on Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 02:51:12PM -0500
Sender: pwot-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: pwot-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <pwot.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: pwot@ietf.org


  Tom,

Thus spake tom worster (tom@ennovatenetworks.com)
 on or about Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 02:51:12PM -0500:
> From: Kireeti Kompella [mailto:kireeti@juniper.net]
> > 
> > Isn't this a solved problem?  MPLS in GRE is trivial, implemented
> > and raring to be interop tested.
> 
> from what i've heard, the extra overhead is not
> tolerable in some important apps, e.g. voip
> and 3g. but over the core gre is an option.

  Does your statement assert that all important
  applications are not tolerable using IP/MPLS/GRE/*
  or just some?

  -alan


_______________________________________________
pwot mailing list
pwot@ietf.org
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwot

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email