Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Remap STOPPING to something other than zero (#1804)

Nick Banks <notifications@github.com> Sat, 29 September 2018 17:44 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA57E130E46 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 29 Sep 2018 10:44:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.455
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.455 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.456, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NIcjg--3x7Qw for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 29 Sep 2018 10:44:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-5.smtp.github.com (out-5.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFFA0130DCD for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sat, 29 Sep 2018 10:44:05 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2018 10:44:04 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1538243044; bh=bvw2C3IBka/JXkuqkY83SGGx96rJdiY8gauDSrS/YXs=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=yQaaSa2tSXMPjABIDAldlKYa+TAsF/ud460KLgFVPcxYg02vvpnDcPSnL7rFngYxI VeDZsiJze9aAoRKmmmXJ+WHSD26yu6gFaPixpBjNfDDXoxrlQe8ni6xu/bCfDXyUUX YBwdUMqo01TCeCnDtKBxdUT04KaQhbTumxjQ2KcY=
From: Nick Banks <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abb141378e6a093b464a8da1a0fa6eebcdbd73103e92cf0000000117c77be492a169ce15b0cecf@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1804/425663044@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1804@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1804@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Remap STOPPING to something other than zero (#1804)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5bafb9e4e34c9_1e7c3ff6020d45c01171bf"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: nibanks
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/-bBDKBtKgIkEWU3EpLazcF-vK3I>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2018 17:44:08 -0000

Personally, I like that graceful and abortive stream closure are separate concepts. To me, it makes them more explicitly different, so they can't get confused.

As far as what to put in the RST_STREAM (sent in response to a STOP_SENDING), I am fine with saying always set error code to 0 OR saying that the any value may be used and the receiver should ignore the value if it sent a STOP_SENDING. If I could choose, I'd prefer the latter.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1804#issuecomment-425663044