Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Be more conservative about migration? (#2143)

MikkelFJ <> Tue, 23 July 2019 10:47 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3A54120072 for <>; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 03:47:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5drH_pUOLfLm for <>; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 03:47:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01C5D12018D for <>; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 03:47:46 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 03:47:46 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1563878866; bh=q0JsXAcBWWhTkdw9Er8qbFPTNcECMR9P+ZM03sB4oDs=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=DkMS5yquDOHEWf7TBSDiT/zKDFSuvNgtXVfRwnvQPwEe+qAFZJ1Mo+apznFVOLRKD jNum+3+AfIamWPJXGOoS7rEnU8fkDZQ9GqEtgfdv31/IOxJo3LfvTLg3bXzDj+QA/y wkXyYCqy1YEdUIpLHz/CES9G1dRtU/KidzvOfLP0=
From: MikkelFJ <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2143/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Be more conservative about migration? (#2143)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d36e5d21047a_53813f9464ccd96c5252c5"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mikkelfj
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 10:47:49 -0000

I think there needs to be a distinction between observing off-path attackers and blind off-path attackers. A blind attacker can inject packets and for example try to force close a connection even if the traffic flow is not visible. Such an attacker is probably the most common.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: