Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Be more conservative about migration? (#2143)

ianswett <> Wed, 30 January 2019 05:31 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5131213118A for <>; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 21:31:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.935
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.935 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-4.553, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9RoGWCT4e-N0 for <>; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 21:31:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA9B0131182 for <>; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 21:31:05 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 21:31:04 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1548826264; bh=PSMExZv6SP6a2xR0nMrW1mnPYqgy+xlxJunIm0gcNXw=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=R3IEsjD3bV318djGfAXigAy04AzjB+PB1ZayRm1k8svlSGQ7vGL06h+Pe8i3SGEYC 5KsBnxmPjxTVgxFFt6/m4/E/rPW0+HlJP6aXdL57Ik3WVGKTGynHPgJCzW8BPCOOzn cLsIp2nc8IXEN7tbX3uHntC88CfJg3XlGeCCY3a4=
From: ianswett <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2143/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Be more conservative about migration? (#2143)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c513698ed4e9_3f583fd3646d45bc6051c0"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 05:31:07 -0000

I'd add "appears to be intentional immediate migration" to the list of research questions.  If a PATH_CHALLENGE is bundled with other frames and the path changes, then it seems very likely the peer knows the path has changed and it's intentional.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: