Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Notify the congestion controller of losses first (#3540)

Marten Seemann <> Tue, 31 March 2020 10:44 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id D47883A1FC6 for <>; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 03:44:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.5
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=0.7, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hKwACsqWK1zZ for <>; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 03:44:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 595353A1FC4 for <>; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 03:44:20 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 03:44:18 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1585651458; bh=qvxzeLtNr+znEbhn27/E4DHfpRTJKZUbzy00buJwh24=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=EMML3Smkbr/V8bln5zKDeivQ7X2dP3jwJhJB3IbFgXgVLl42Ybc7VJ/pfudblmAZT oSsg0I/Qn9uCia8ElLnHd8DKNTn8ffeR3FXhva/FNJLv9zNPURGEpdJ584st2JFhWS 8Yc8xwKRsv+6T3i8+yWJhSHK47Z5Tg0rEALTTLdw=
From: Marten Seemann <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3540/review/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Notify the congestion controller of losses first (#3540)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e831f0259fa1_69a23fe4afecd960860ce"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: marten-seemann
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 10:44:23 -0000

@marten-seemann commented on this pull request.

`DetectLostPackets` used to call `OnPacketsLost(lost_packets)`. What do we gain by moving this out of `DetectLostPackets`?

I believe this does not change the order in which the congestion controller is informed about the losses. This could have been achieved by interchanging the two calls to `OnPacketsLost` and `OnPacketsAcked` in `OnAckReceived`. Or am I missing something here?

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: