Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Limit RCID state (#3547)

Martin Thomson <> Tue, 31 March 2020 00:16 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3A8D3A162E for <>; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 17:16:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.5
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=0.7, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ivcLonLBA-ZP for <>; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 17:16:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A61B3A162C for <>; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 17:16:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E4A92827EB for <>; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 17:16:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1585613767; bh=wY/ycgVJjh7O8O9J18776gybh13U/f0pjEY9XZ3X4jg=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=ZaEjHi9LJFD+3kxgNfVNFjMtaYmj8epWZU5dXoBqLttZcDt0Y3+VRRmv+6xySghku 7sk2xQ5d6/WHMpgUehlP1czjzDe7xd4TmjJjziM6Xfa0XC4NtkZt4Nvx5S7BBWF0kv 63m93wqUAF4qbGLC7n2M7yXlO1PfJc9f4qYc0awI=
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 17:16:07 -0700
From: Martin Thomson <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3547/review/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Limit RCID state (#3547)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e828bc75e9ce_67c03fc652acd96c2870b6"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 00:16:11 -0000

@martinthomson commented on this pull request.

> +RETIRE_CONNECTION_IDs SHOULD be at least the active_connection_id_limit.  If the
+number of outstanding RETIRE_CONNECTION_IDs exceeds twice the
+active_connection_id_limit, the connection MAY be closed with a connection error

In that case, I would prefer something a little more terse and less prescriptive.

> An endpoint MAY choose to treat having too many connection IDs in need of retirement as a connection error of type CONNECTION_ID_LIMIT_ERROR.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: