Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Limit RCID state (#3547)

ianswett <> Mon, 30 March 2020 23:29 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D5F53A159C for <>; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 16:29:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.5
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=0.7, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BFFaJGSES6hh for <>; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 16:29:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6A113A159A for <>; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 16:29:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10BDB1C02F3 for <>; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 16:29:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1585610992; bh=jCBVvBJJ6LPmF+pOBKlzzJFzPzvtDyjOaHHdiBt3io4=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=o+Api/BZFwSSwBC0I8CONzjPdSdpMXsop3/CYpce1F5LLeWzh5ekdllHO9ILeKDJ2 KFBA9+kESPcZ6glw/9x389YTKNhrKLHw4eC3OsREvtujXUmizNtPyek4AkqJ0Y3aI7 ImvOONiAGRfKOvhnllNck0lmNRm5c07qmoSU1brA=
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 16:29:52 -0700
From: ianswett <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3547/review/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Limit RCID state (#3547)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e8280f01b42_62543f80c24cd95c48311e"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 23:29:54 -0000

@ianswett commented on this pull request.

> +RETIRE_CONNECTION_IDs SHOULD be at least the active_connection_id_limit.  If the
+number of outstanding RETIRE_CONNECTION_IDs exceeds twice the
+active_connection_id_limit, the connection MAY be closed with a connection error

Assuming we move forward with this PR, this is what I intend our implementation to do.  I realize that 'A server's gotta do what a server's gotta do' but I'd prefer an explicit expectation for ease of debugging.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: