Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Limit RCID state (#3547)

Mike Bishop <> Fri, 27 March 2020 20:08 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6663C3A0952 for <>; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 13:08:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.008
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.008 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.092, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PAtC-mgVohmc for <>; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 13:08:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6D903A076C for <>; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 13:08:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A26F8C1EB6 for <>; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 13:08:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1585339685; bh=AKsjDN5uO6rFId4i3GGnDowML2C9Co0PRQMqWDhMiQY=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=0go8w7GMzTMavNcQFRc6VBAsCnm4vzMtpX8Ol6avBdLvG+2sXlelV8SAqtmSZ/7Ks 3bC9pW/Sk99nW1qp20mY/vIWykiPiPhETf/lJM9Jwu5CuYp6maBlOPDMBUjY+pSwP9 m9L7mCtZ8fyz7aT5K+h2CQcHQ9qqn/4u/0saOYJ4=
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 13:08:05 -0700
From: Mike Bishop <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3547/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Limit RCID state (#3547)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e7e5d257b9a3_5ca43ff1170cd96822890"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: MikeBishop
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 20:08:09 -0000

> it would clean up some accounting issues if each NCID frame MUST set Retire Prior To to more than the maximum continuous sequence number that it had recieved an RCID for. Worthwhile?

That's interesting to send at first glance, but then poses the question of what the recipient of NCID should do when it sees an RPT value change.  There's a difference in behavior between "I've seen these" and "you need to send these."

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: