Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify client anti-amplification response (#3445)

Christian Huitema <> Thu, 20 February 2020 00:27 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5785120271 for <>; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 16:27:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.999
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xYq00lesbz9Q for <>; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 16:27:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DF87120113 for <>; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 16:27:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12308E0054 for <>; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 16:27:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1582158462; bh=kh04RXwWDDOZGwCECNwx3XE5W+281tAd072Z0sdkZSA=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=B6JgcBFzb83KxAMcDqhO8TyiQa15wwvUZ/P+I/4MiRveqD30iuejsixsS/EyeH75D S/ddE3K5bXJipakwaLDjD8XhEN5sVgZD3f/fDj6mPI6GutksSjtKfqk+RZ7P+QtAop vbAEL2DiJi5G7rU/vMKvN8qIFigHgPEZ2h0YiiUI=
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 16:27:42 -0800
From: Christian Huitema <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3445/review/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify client anti-amplification response (#3445)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e4dd27e371_68a63fccdd0cd96c22006a"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: huitema
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 00:27:45 -0000

huitema commented on this pull request.

> -handshake deadlock, clients MUST send a packet upon a probe timeout, as
-described in {{QUIC-RECOVERY}}. If the client has no data to retransmit and does
-not have Handshake keys, it MUST send an Initial packet in a UDP datagram of
-at least 1200 bytes.  If the client has Handshake keys, it SHOULD send a
-Handshake packet.
+Loss of an Initial or Handshake packet from the server can cause a deadlock if
+the client does not send additional Initial or Handshake packets.  The server
+can reach its anti-amplification limit, but if the client has received
+acknowledgements for all the data is has sent, it has no reason to send more
+packets. In this case, where the client would otherwise not send any
+additional packets, the server will be unable to send because it has not
+received enough from the client or validated the clients address. To prevent
+this deadlock, clients MUST send a packet on a probe timeout, or PTO;
+see Section 5.3 of {{QUIC-RECOVERY}}. In this case, the client MUST send an
+Initial packet in a UDP datagram of at least 1200 bytes if it does not have
+Handshake keys, and otherwise send a Handshake packet.

I am not asking for a change in the current text. This PR is fine.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: