Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QUIC lacks on-path exposure of packet loss (#3189)

Mark Nottingham <> Tue, 19 November 2019 06:01 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E9EE12082E for <>; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 22:01:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u99AN6wK_zkE for <>; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 22:01:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 154BE120846 for <>; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 22:01:44 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 22:01:42 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1574143302; bh=iLhjV/SZou3M3Mkn6ujKpLOgAg1RDzGqcMcwmcW2+UE=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=FPfarORVjnvYxFBxm0xGvYWUV7wAnKZLvG3TpJ176wFheNMTLsLAQc7sMU5HWr3/5 B2Gdu5Mfco1VGahH5qJkhbyOer2MQlLOEQALNmfrqVNpDTWNHqzMDddl2IiQ0E9HI9 m4TLCT7/rbLjMMnLe6Nai4FCbyVhuCEhRxaGHQO0=
From: Mark Nottingham <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3189/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QUIC lacks on-path exposure of packet loss (#3189)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5dd38546d4158_6dfc3f81424cd9689074f"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mnot
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 06:01:52 -0000

Discussed in Singapore. The discussion there came to the conclusion that the best path forward was to not consider this in-scope for QUICv1, but to encourage the proponents to rework their draft as an extension proposal.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: