Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] max_packet_size in 0-RTT (#3447)
Nick Banks <notifications@github.com> Thu, 20 February 2020 15:03 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9EF01200CC for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 07:03:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.382
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hbsnBARkubGO for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 07:03:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-5.smtp.github.com (out-5.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4454C120119 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 07:03:28 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 07:03:27 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1582211007; bh=udZeACLUwXI0qA/Xaz74gVfypYYy0LO0e1AeIH+/ge8=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=ofSJHJmtE8PYEBInC+4IZ4cO0zt6IpAXrkKzZn1azmUMob/hNfdIajsJd2qAc4wru Eg53n4oVpMnxvK38hBVnyJmIGWujaQN5n9hbieVl5pTjaWweZvxklwyR9mfHnWcWGi riMnCLMp/nMM3r+WSmATS8ZhSaMC7ZlAjJXVJsUE=
From: Nick Banks <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK3RYUTQ2QLIFQKVYDF4LPJD7EVBNHHCDDCFOU@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3447/589095058@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3447@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3447@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] max_packet_size in 0-RTT (#3447)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e4e9fbf7316c_4d23f95890cd95c35937"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: nibanks
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/GTxtB1QHnEZmPZMVreNP9rMlbdo>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 15:03:34 -0000
I like @kazuho's suggestion, and I especially agree with the point about already risking the network dropping the packet if it's more than 1200 bytes. There's no need to say you must drop the packet if it's bigger. If you ended up being able to receive the packet successfully even though it was more than you advertised, go ahead and process it. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3447#issuecomment-589095058
- [quicwg/base-drafts] max_packet_size in 0-RTT (#3… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] max_packet_size in 0-RTT… martinduke
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] max_packet_size in 0-RTT… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] max_packet_size in 0-RTT… Lars Eggert
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] max_packet_size in 0-RTT… martinduke
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] max_packet_size in 0-RTT… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] max_packet_size in 0-RTT… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] max_packet_size in 0-RTT… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] max_packet_size in 0-RTT… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] max_packet_size in 0-RTT… martinduke
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] max_packet_size in 0-RTT… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] max_packet_size in 0-RTT… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] max_packet_size in 0-RTT… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] max_packet_size in 0-RTT… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] max_packet_size in 0-RTT… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] max_packet_size in 0-RTT… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] max_packet_size in 0-RTT… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] max_packet_size in 0-RTT… Martin Thomson