Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be applied per each 5-tuple rather than per connection (#1828)

Kazuho Oku <notifications@github.com> Wed, 07 November 2018 18:29 UTC

Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2018 10:28:58 -0800
From: Kazuho Oku <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab013b04e497e22cf381bd35985ed906c3055022c892cf0000000117faf0ea92a169ce15d27d33@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1828/436728629@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1828@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1828@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be applied per each 5-tuple rather than per connection (#1828)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5be32eeab4c59_1d453fc2d88d45c034944b"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/Mo77zFTumiEXkagu6_Ke80jhOgY>

Based on the offline discussion at Bangkok, my understanding is that we have two possibilities; either suggest that:
* when more than one connections are coalesced onto a single 5-tuple, spin *none* of them
or 
* when more than one connections are coalesced onto a single 5-tuple, spin *at most one* of them

The latter gives the observers better chance of seeing the signal, at the cost of being required to determine the CID that actually spins. 

Assuming that we would have enough connections that are spinning, it might also be safe to assume that many connections will not be coalesced onto a single 5-tuple. If that is the case, the former would be sufficient.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1828#issuecomment-436728629

[quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be applied p… Kazuho Oku
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… ianswett
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… Lars Eggert
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… MikkelFJ
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… Kazuho Oku
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… MikkelFJ
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… MikkelFJ
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… Kazuho Oku
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… MikkelFJ
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… Kazuho Oku
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… MikkelFJ
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… Martin Thomson
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… Brian Trammell
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… Brian Trammell
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… Kazuho Oku
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… Martin Thomson
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… erickinnear
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… ianswett
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… Martin Thomson
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… MikkelFJ
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… Brian Trammell
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… MikkelFJ
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… erickinnear
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… Brian Trammell
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… Kazuho Oku
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… Martin Thomson
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… mirjak
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… Martin Thomson
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… Martin Thomson