IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be applied per each 5-tuple rather than per connection (#1828)

Brian Trammell <notifications@github.com> Wed, 07 November 2018 14:54 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C2A9130DCA for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 06:54:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.47
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.47 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.47, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mV4wYfYRmOK2 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 06:54:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from o3.sgmail.github.com (o3.sgmail.github.com [192.254.112.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FF1C130DC9 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 06:54:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=Rw/wU0PpClyUq7zr+x4dPdEUk5Y=; b=G58wjnbJB8nT9oai 60kWPxZutDeh52hwNpHawR2f6YN7bLTwkI7qYWKy4IelwEcpX0pknrxQiexq4oBs Ml4DVKebzXeWaByQ+nH8u6x94satYYw3uIdcy2LrkpeRpnI+WjbKqDhfoCtGAplY TPjhGpztyIQrZiFlqKguaUq20X0=
Received: by filter1450p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter1450p1mdw1-15566-5BE2FC9E-26 2018-11-07 14:54:22.539620148 +0000 UTC m=+131732.441096855
Received: from github-lowworker-dc5ea3e.cp1-iad.github.net (unknown [192.30.252.45]) by ismtpd0001p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id xapqEbPBQAOglpBOOMiuJg for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 07 Nov 2018 14:54:22.577 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from github.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by github-lowworker-dc5ea3e.cp1-iad.github.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58532261EAA for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 06:54:22 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2018 14:54:22 +0000
From: Brian Trammell <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab119c06f61c491dbea4798a8497d96d3db0b4b04592cf0000000117fabe9e92a169ce15d27d33@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1828/436649593@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1828@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1828@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be applied per each 5-tuple rather than per connection (#1828)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5be2fc9e555ef_6d133fa74c6d45c4178457"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: britram
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak1V3KvKWDsieZCtmgRw4JgAaUxJWJoSbGaYFN +Hcre4gIAcXNJKJDSJ0vMNie3HFOX73DTbiKBgxhbGRnynrab5GQhFZ9O/+cMMuoovOO+xp3CJUWXx Xi2hyK5dNtQGE3LwFWNDrhXVdOA4r+7Mwvm9zadU47/ZuXqJ+Fo3qnnfK4qT7bGcvm8JrAoT9zrE8d 8=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/dbzj2mrHkLkcx1vvf6Q7AggNN2E>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2018 14:54:25 -0000

Agree with @kazuho, this should be per 5-tuple. However, it's not clear what the best way is to reconcile that with our desire to try to reduce CID linkability on migration by making the spin bit reset state (and indeed, even reset spin-participation state) on CID change. 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1828#issuecomment-436649593

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email