Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be applied per each 5-tuple rather than per connection (#1828)

Kazuho Oku <notifications@github.com> Mon, 12 November 2018 12:16 UTC

Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 04:16:35 -0800
From: Kazuho Oku <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab65b4a1c45855d8356a5b255734aa495465c3ae0e92cf000000011801312392a169ce15d27d33@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1828/437858230@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1828@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1828@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be applied per each 5-tuple rather than per connection (#1828)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5be96f23d3734_6b83fe99a4d45b8711ef"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/sNKI695ntAXVacmEeFYH8caocow>

I agree that from endpoint's perspective spinning per connection is the easiest thing to do.

>From observer's perspective, it becomes hard to track which client CID is associated to which server CID when multiple CIDs rotate simultaneously, but all you lose in that case is the capability to observe the distance between the observation point and the endpoints. The RTT of the connection would still be observable.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1828#issuecomment-437858230

[quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be applied p… Kazuho Oku
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… ianswett
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… Lars Eggert
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… MikkelFJ
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… Kazuho Oku
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… MikkelFJ
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… MikkelFJ
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… Kazuho Oku
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… MikkelFJ
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… Kazuho Oku
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… MikkelFJ
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… Martin Thomson
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… Brian Trammell
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… Brian Trammell
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… Kazuho Oku
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… Martin Thomson
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… erickinnear
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… ianswett
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… Martin Thomson
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… MikkelFJ
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… Brian Trammell
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… MikkelFJ
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… erickinnear
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… Brian Trammell
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… Kazuho Oku
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… Martin Thomson
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… mirjak
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… Martin Thomson
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be appli… Martin Thomson