Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Authenticate connection IDs (#3499)

David Schinazi <> Sun, 22 March 2020 20:48 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CD523A045B for <>; Sun, 22 Mar 2020 13:48:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.482
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.482 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zn5g8I4m96uH for <>; Sun, 22 Mar 2020 13:48:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E175F3A0443 for <>; Sun, 22 Mar 2020 13:48:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18914C602FF for <>; Sun, 22 Mar 2020 13:48:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1584910122; bh=eXts78y8/Bw1Ktge9iMWP0rHrCUIwufBKNbUjaS4/sE=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=VdbLGGLceulI829nw4DQ1VjboFt4kzpQ3bcYg4InIHkW0sethmd77RM8Gfl9yCHTe SncDXJf7Ua3bhnxxVEZcI9pcNSMrqcpPsWBoQ3/rftYB44xa3Zs51Xpu+u5KAjObIE Rm3J72wy7Te/r0AnuHh7o4SrcMyeLGDu5k2gW56U=
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2020 13:48:42 -0700
From: David Schinazi <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3499/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Authenticate connection IDs (#3499)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e77cf2a99eb_51303f96418cd964106636"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: DavidSchinazi
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2020 20:48:45 -0000

I like @huitema's deployment plan. I think it would be valuable to get deployment experience of these new transport parameters in draft-27 so that it doesn't break interop. Perhaps we should add a temporary subsection to the spec on how to this, with a note that it'll be removed before publication. It could say something like this:
1. If using draft-28 or later, these transport parameters MUST be sent, and received ones MUST be validated.
2. If using draft-27 or earlier, these transport parameters SHOULD be sent, and upon receipt:
    - if `handshake_connection_id` is present, then validate using draft-28 rules
    - else validate using draft-27 rules


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: