Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Fix congestion control permissiveness (#3248)

mirjak <> Wed, 27 November 2019 13:23 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90C2A1208BB for <>; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 05:23:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r2wpY8JAnggk for <>; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 05:23:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28C5512004E for <>; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 05:23:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35F7E96064E for <>; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 05:23:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1574861031; bh=cU4W3p53XrikkLKjp1AlZwDuGyXBzg41Mvxc1GHtBWs=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=pyckCY6PQLQdCguHNZ3MtzJCVBxW2IN7HmouB4+oUrIpUkjBy3Ta/NEIX1QEoz/ZA DgkNVMTxYVLI17gd2wdlSFnM7MAVmAoOch46QbFHGwRcWDjVBbPqgEPFgrQwH8/AIn SK7IER36yFVZao683e9QFyqc4Rblvs2qRnohx1jo=
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 05:23:51 -0800
From: mirjak <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3248/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Fix congestion control permissiveness (#3248)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5dde78e7258ae_22b63fa5c48cd9681296b7"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mirjak
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 13:23:54 -0000

RFC8085 has basically only SHOULDs because it tries to cover all kind of cases of UDP-based protocols. So if we can be more specific for QUIC that would be good. However, QUIC is also meant as a general purpose protocol so I'm not sure we can. I think it is most important to have a pointer to RFC8085. Not sure if any other requirements can be made (other than don't break the Internet) unfortunately...

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: