Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Two Loss bits (Q&R) (#2594)

[Alexandre Ferrieux <[e-mail]>]

> IMO this is clearly beyond the scope of QUICv1. Not all work going on with QUIC deserves a link from the main repo. It is straightforward to set up a separate GitHub repo following MTs instructions if you want your document source to be available.
> 
> I also recommend the above suggestions, post an Individual Draft and promote the work on the mailing list. The working group can, at the chairs discretion, give consideration on if there is support to adopt the document etc.

So, I take it that the prerequisite to suggesting any new idea  now amounts to writing a bona fide I-D, regardless of how incremental the idea is wrt existing wg material ?

Isn't there a more lightweight approach, allowing to reuse the nice github workflow for new material, but in a separate "not approved yet" area ?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2594#issuecomment-480997638