Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Two Loss bits (Q&R) (#2594)
Lucas Pardue <notifications@github.com> Mon, 08 April 2019 21:01 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0F3C12034F for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 14:01:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U1UTVIYQ8CB2 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 14:01:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-5.smtp.github.com (out-5.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64B7A120013 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 14:01:20 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2019 14:01:19 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1554757279; bh=Om4aZlEVBZ2Vm2KoHWjRGyqRRuJ5UJXga2ERJX33MA8=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=pg05MtOzl9HkCgzfrfQdIzIy12KZhqIvyHHwcUFztRmQwylii8Rx4B2uqDrkVG9uX S+I5MYrYtzTAtIGYQOv91dbMIAEDf3x02+lGBC7B/L/7/vZCUdbkKNAwiNdiHuyXLa JKXBHnM+ysD/IO87oXoWFEflnrPBd6Zw/FbA+a9Q=
From: Lucas Pardue <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab8dd984e64717840de9dc74b6526c5b89a73db5db92cf0000000118c3789f92a169ce19aaba39@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2594/c481006392@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2594@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2594@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Two Loss bits (Q&R) (#2594)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5cabb69f71db6_2fe33faa11cd45c43082ef"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: LPardue
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/udaPfiuwxoLfXtu2ZWG1_D6yjpA>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2019 21:01:22 -0000
You've clearly put the effort in to write this draft, which is great. However, we should ensure we respect the chair's process; several QUIC drafts are now in the late stage process as described in CONTRIBUTING.md (https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#late-stage-process). I'd encourage you to file an issue that articulates the problem statement and the benefits of the proposal. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2594#issuecomment-481006392
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Two Loss bits (Q&R) (#2594) Alexandre Ferrieux
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Two Loss bits (Q&R) (#25… Alexandre Ferrieux
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Two Loss bits (Q&R) (#25… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Two Loss bits (Q&R) (#25… Alexandre Ferrieux
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Two Loss bits (Q&R) (#25… Alexandre Ferrieux
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Two Loss bits (Q&R) (#25… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Two Loss bits (Q&R) (#25… Alexandre Ferrieux
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Two Loss bits (Q&R) (#25… Alexandre Ferrieux
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Two Loss bits (Q&R) (#25… Alexandre Ferrieux
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Two Loss bits (Q&R) (#25… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Two Loss bits (Q&R) (#25… Alexandre Ferrieux
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Two Loss bits (Q&R) (#25… Alexandre Ferrieux
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Two Loss bits (Q&R) (#25… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Two Loss bits (Q&R) (#25… Lucas Pardue
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Two Loss bits (Q&R) (#25… Alexandre Ferrieux
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Two Loss bits (Q&R) (#25… David Schinazi
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Two Loss bits (Q&R) (#25… Lucas Pardue
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Two Loss bits (Q&R) (#25… Alexandre Ferrieux
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Two Loss bits (Q&R) (#25… Lucas Pardue
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Two Loss bits (Q&R) (#25… Alexandre Ferrieux
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Two Loss bits (Q&R) (#25… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Two Loss bits (Q&R) (#25… Lucas Pardue
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Two Loss bits (Q&R) (#25… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Two Loss bits (Q&R) (#25… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Two Loss bits (Q&R) (#25… Alexandre Ferrieux
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Two Loss bits (Q&R) (#25… Mark Nottingham