Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Boolean blocked streams setting (#3073)

Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa <> Thu, 03 October 2019 00:02 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83E8F1200FF for <>; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 17:02:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yr51fmBqwP48 for <>; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 17:02:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD09C1200F4 for <>; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 17:02:03 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2019 17:02:02 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1570060922; bh=14vk6k1NWB/wbU2jEsFOixUVjdQ8he7XPDgXtjcG3Uc=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=VAaqvRiONrcLL7NPIBmUhiwwGOvEzwtfb8Pypgz769aw/pPZIIHtx4Z1pjX34Aljl m6DeYVEKGalNVQVpAnttF+u0ktABB0n8qPN90tQdp4Ny9P7PbWL8Zo8rMjvQn0QBjY nMbxf6b+4z8DTAyPUzK1UTgFneFlt8QA3YEy5fc4=
From: Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3073/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Boolean blocked streams setting (#3073)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d953a7ac79a5_38a63ff3ab6cd96c31632"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: tatsuhiro-t
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2019 00:02:06 -0000

The only reason to set the limit under MAX_STREAMS I can think of is avoid too much of head of line blocking. If there is no evidence that numerical limit (fraction of MAX_STREAMS) brings better performance, then boolean thing would be better.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: